Absorbed in Inertia: Activation Analysis for Computer-Use Agents
cs.AI
Submitted: 2026-09-29
Updated: 2026-09-29
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
The gist: Computer-use agents have become increasingly capable of executing tasks on live desktops through natural-language instructions, based on trajectories of screenshots, actions, and reasoning.
Abstract
Computer-use agents have become increasingly capable of executing tasks on live desktops through natural-language instructions, based on trajectories of screenshots, actions, and reasoning. We discover that they can stealthily exhibit inertia, in which they repeat fruitless actions despite recognizing that these actions are ineffective. We hypothesize that inertia is reflected in the agent's internal state, i.e., the activation values of the agent's underlying model, and propose a protocol to measure the relationship between the two. Extensive analysis of high-dimensional activation states shows that inertia corresponds to an absorbing region of activation space, where activation values become stale across actions and even after attempts to steer them. We conjecture that drastically changing the agents' activations by re-initializing them is necessary to escape inertia. Specifically, we propose R cubed (Reset, Reroute, Restore), which temporarily resets the agent's context trajectory to escape the absorbing region and then restores the historical context to effectively complete the task. Our approach yields 17-55% lower measured inertia across models relative to unmodified agents. These results suggest that changing the context can interrupt recurrence more effectively than directly steering the resulting activations. Our code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/vlm-agent-defense-D076
Sources
- AgentRx: Diagnosing AI Agent Failures from Execution Trajectories
- GUI-Shepherd: Reliable Process Reward and Verification for Long-Sequence GUI Tasks
- The Danger of Overthinking: Examining the Reasoning-Action Dilemma in Agentic Tasks
- VLAA-GUI: Knowing When to Stop, Recover, and Search, A Modular Framework for GUI Automation
- Redundant or Necessary? A Benchmark for Detecting Redundant Steps in Agent Trajectories
- OverThink: Slowdown Attacks on Reasoning LLMs
- Overthinking Loops in Agents: A Structural Risk via MCP Tools
- The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasets
- In-context Learning and Induction Heads
- Learning to Steer: Input-dependent Steering for Multimodal LLMs
- UI-TARS: Pioneering Automated GUI Interaction with Native Agents
- Controlling Large Language Model Agents with Entropic Activation Steering
- TACT: Mitigating Overthinking and Overacting in Coding Agents via Activation Steering
- OpenComputer: Verifiable Software Worlds for Computer-Use Agents
- GUI-PRA: Process Reward Agent for GUI Tasks
- Mobile-Agent-v3.5: Multi-platform Fundamental GUI Agents
- EvoCUA: Evolving Computer Use Agents via Learning from Scalable Synthetic Experience
- Why Retrying Fails: Context Contamination in LLM Agent Pipelines
- ProgRM: Build Better GUI Agents with Progress Rewards
- Don't Act Blindly: Robust GUI Automation via Action-Effect Verification and Self-Correction
Related papers
- MAVEN-T: Reinforced Heterogeneous Distillation for Real-Time Multi-Agent Trajectory Prediction
- Model Discovery Agent: LLM-assisted Bayesian experiment design for data-efficient discovery of mechanistic world models
- Agents' Last Exam
- The Clinician's Veto: Navigating Trust, Liability, and Uncertainty in Autonomous AI Prescribing
- MindHelper: Closed-Loop Embodied Mental-State Reasoning for Precision Intervention
- Incumbent Advantage: Brand Bias and Cognitive Manipulation Dynamics in LLM Recommendation Systems