Question-Specific Knowledge Graphs for Efficient Visual Reasoning
cs.CL
Submitted: 2026-09-28
Updated: 2026-09-28
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Recent work in visual question answering has shown that vision-language models can exhibit strong reasoning capabilities by translating visual inputs into textual representations.
Terminology
Abstract
Recent work in visual question answering has shown that vision-language models can exhibit strong reasoning capabilities by translating visual inputs into textual representations. The effectiveness of this translation depends on how well visual details are retained; models need to surface and align both explicit and implicit knowledge sufficient to support reasoning, without introducing spurious assumptions. Existing methods that leverage detailed image captions introduce visual details unrelated to the reasoning task, inflating input token counts and increasing computational cost. To address these challenges, we propose VisKG, a reinforcement learning (RL) framework in which models learn to translate visual content into question-specific knowledge graph (KG) representations. This process filters out perceptual noise while preserving the entity-relation structure needed for chain-of-thought reasoning, following the principle of minimum sufficient information. To ensure stable RL post-training, VisKG adopts Group reward-Decoupled Normalization Policy Optimization (GDPO). In addition, we strengthen the supervision stage with negative rationale samples, exposing the model to incorrect reasoning paths before RL post-training. Experimental results across science, mathematics, and general visual understanding benchmarks show that VisKG achieves performance comparable to or better than baselines, while requiring fewer tokens than caption-based representations. Moreover, training VisKG with GDPO improves accuracy by 2% over its GRPO-trained counterpart on average. These results suggest that KG representations are a promising approach for supporting multi-step reasoning and open up future work on adaptively selecting the most suitable representation for a given task.
Sources
- Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report
- Prune Redundancy, Preserve Essence: Vision Token Compression in VLMs via Synergistic Importance-Diversity
- MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models
- Vision-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in Multimodal Large Language Models
- VIDEOP2R: Video Understanding from Perception to Reasoning
- GDPO: Group reward-Decoupled Normalization Policy Optimization for Multi-reward RL Optimization
- Efficient Whole Slide Pathology VQA via Token Compression
- VLM-R1: A Stable and Generalizable R1-style Large Vision-Language Model
- Interactive Post-Training for Vision-Language-Action Models
- Scaling Behaviors of LLM Reinforcement Learning Post-Training: An Empirical Study in Mathematical Reasoning
- Learning from Mistakes: Negative Reasoning Samples Enhance Out-of-Domain Generalization
- The information bottleneck method
- Visionary-R1: Mitigating Shortcuts in Visual Reasoning with Reinforcement Learning
- Qwen3 Technical Report
- Perception-R1: Pioneering Perception Policy with Reinforcement Learning
- Reassessing the Role of Supervised Fine-Tuning: An Empirical Study in VLM Reasoning
- WikiSeeker: Rethinking the Role of Vision-Language Models in Knowledge-Based Visual Question Answering
Related papers
- Exploring Solution Divergence and Its Effect on Large Language Model Problem Solving
- Ishigaki-IDS-Bench: A Benchmark for Generating Information Delivery Specification from BIM Information Requirements
- Subliminal Steering: Stronger Encoding of Hidden Signals
- MedStruct-S: A Benchmark for Key Discovery, Key-Conditioned QA and Semi-Structured Extraction from OCR Clinical Reports
- The End of Transformers? On Challenging Attention and the Rise of Sub-Quadratic Architectures
- Untangling the Mechanisms of Misleading Context in Medical Question Answering