RSI-Master: Structuring Experiments to Guide Autonomous Model Improvement
cs.AI
Submitted: 2026-09-28
Updated: 2026-09-30
Code: https://github.com/DorothyDUUU/RSI-Master
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Recursive self-improvement (RSI) seeks to enable AI systems to participate in improving their own capabilities.
Abstract
Recursive self-improvement (RSI) seeks to enable AI systems to participate in improving their own capabilities. A concrete pathway is autonomous model development, where agents iteratively explore post-training strategies to improve a base model. This setting faces two challenges: agents may exploit open-ended experimental actions through hacking, and repeated experimentation may lead to strategy lock-in, where an early direction is refined rather than reconsidered. We introduce RSI-Master, which addresses the two challenges at two levels: regularize step-wise actions, avoiding hacking behaviors, and promote well-structured exploration of research directions, avoiding strategy lock-in. RSI-Master consists of an Experiment OS, which enables regularized experimental actions and maintains persistent, traceable experimental records, and Reviewer-Guided Research Orchestration, which organizes Workers and Reviewers in a dynamically growing research DAG. Workers explore diverse research directions and Reviewers compare evidence across related experiments for subsequent explorations. On PostTrainBench with Qwen3-4B-Base, it averages 54.49 versus 46.53 for the strongest agent baseline, with a 0.0% hacking rate. Scaling to 35B model, RSI-Master surpasses the human-developed Instruct model on LiveCodeBench-v6 (41.21 vs. 37.36) and SciCode, and reaches a nonzero score on HorizonMath, a benchmark of unsolved research problems on which most frontier models score near zero.
Sources
- HealthBench: Evaluating Large Language Models Towards Improved Human Health
- MathArena: Evaluating LLMs on Uncontaminated Math Competitions
- Pre-Flight: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models on Aviation Operational Knowledge
- Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code
- Recursive Self-Improvement in AI: From Bounded Self-Refinement to Autonomous Research Loops
- Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems
- Beyond Benchmarks: MathArena as an Evaluation Platform for Mathematics with LLMs
- DataMaster: Data-Centric Autonomous AI Research
- HealthBench Professional: Evaluating Large Language Models on Real Clinician Chats
- SciCode-Verified: How Benchmark Defects Underestimated the Scientific-Coding Ability of Language Models
- A Survey of Agent Memory in the Second Half: Towards Self-Evolving and Long-Horizon Agents
- AIDE: AI-Driven Exploration in the Space of Code
- From Scores to Skills: A Cognitive Diagnosis Framework for Evaluating Financial Large Language Models
- Meta-Harness: End-to-End Optimization of Model Harnesses
- The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearning
- From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipeline
- What is Missing from AI Post-Training AI: An Empirical Analysis
- SkillRevise: Improving LLM-Authored Agent Skills via Trace-Conditioned Skill Revision
- The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discovery
- TREX: Automating LLM Fine-tuning via Agent-Driven Tree-based Exploration
Related papers
- MAVEN-T: Reinforced Heterogeneous Distillation for Real-Time Multi-Agent Trajectory Prediction
- Model Discovery Agent: LLM-assisted Bayesian experiment design for data-efficient discovery of mechanistic world models
- Agents' Last Exam
- The Clinician's Veto: Navigating Trust, Liability, and Uncertainty in Autonomous AI Prescribing
- MindHelper: Closed-Loop Embodied Mental-State Reasoning for Precision Intervention
- Incumbent Advantage: Brand Bias and Cognitive Manipulation Dynamics in LLM Recommendation Systems