Optimal Transport Dropout for Structured Predictive Uncertainty
cs.LG, cs.NA, math.NA
Submitted: 2026-09-27
Updated: 2026-09-27
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Deterministic neural networks and neural operators provide point predictions with no intrinsic measure of reliability.
Terminology
Abstract
Deterministic neural networks and neural operators provide point predictions with no intrinsic measure of reliability. Yet, predictive uncertainty may stem from irreducible outcome variability, finite data, or limitations of the chosen model class. Monte Carlo dropout offers a computationally convenient way to construct a predictive distribution through stochastic feature masking, without training multiple independent networks or explicitly inferring a posterior over model parameters. However, its perturbation law is largely prescribed a priori and typically factorised across latent coordinates. We introduce Optimal Transport Dropout (OTD), which instead learns the predictive mapping and the law of its latent perturbations jointly. Starting from a simple independent reference distribution, OTD transports latent perturbations through a learnable flow and propagates them through the predictive neural network, thereby inducing a structured predictive law. Training uses the strictly proper Energy Score, while a kinetic-action term geometrically regularises the transport. Synthetic benchmarks show that OTD captures multimodal predictive distributions, generates meaningful dispersion when the model is misspecified, and exhibits contracting dispersion as more training data or greater model capacity are provided. For a field-valued partial differential equation surrogate, predictive dispersion strongly aligns with the spatial pattern of prediction errors. On this task, compared with Monte Carlo dropout, OTD yields more accurate predictions and better-calibrated, substantially narrower intervals. On real-world regression benchmarks, it further shows competitive accuracy and better probabilistic predictions compared to established baselines. OTD therefore offers a way to learn structured predictive uncertainty without explicit posterior inference or ensembles of independently trained predictors.
Sources
- Uncertainty-Aware Distribution-to-Distribution Flow Matching for Scientific Imaging
- Nonparametric estimation of conditional probability distributions using a generative approach based on conditional push-forward neural networks
- Multidimensional Uncertainty Quantification via Optimal Transport
- Structure-Aware Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification for Neural Operator PDE Surrogates
- Geometry-Aware Post-Hoc Uncertainty Quantification in Operator Learning
- Error Analysis of Neural-Network-Based Engression
- On the sensitivity of machine-learned probabilistic weather forecast models to scale-aware scoring rules
- A Ground-Truth Framework for Uncertainty Disentanglement with Posterior Risk
Related papers
- Polynomial-Augmented Neural Networks (PANNs) with Weak Orthogonality Constraints for Enhanced Function and PDE Approximation
- AIRL-S: Unifying Reinforcement Learning and Search-Based Test-Time Scaling via Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning
- Transformers as Bayesian In-Context Experimenters: Smoothness-Adaptive Efficient ATE Estimation
- Convergence issues in Relational Concept Analysis based on AOC-posets
- Beliefs Beyond Posteriors: The Predictive Cost of ELBO Binding
- Understanding Diffusion Models via Ratio-Based Function Approximation with SignReLU Networks