From Scene Graphs to Answers: Selective Neuro-Symbolic Reasoning for Autonomous Driving
cs.AI
Submitted: 2026-09-26
Updated: 2026-09-26
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Autonomous-driving question answering requires reasoning over structured scene information, yet existing vision-language approaches largely delegate heterogeneous reasoning operations to a single
Terminology
Abstract
Autonomous-driving question answering requires reasoning over structured scene information, yet existing vision-language approaches largely delegate heterogeneous reasoning operations to a single neural inference process. We argue that this uniform strategy overlooks a fundamental distinction: some queries admit exact symbolic solutions, while others require semantic interpretation. We introduce a query-adaptive neuro-symbolic reasoning framework that explicitly allocates computation according to the nature of the query. At its core is a hierarchical Spatiotemporal Scene Graph (STSG) that separates persistent object identities from frame-specific states and represents spatial relations and temporal transitions as explicit directed structures. Given a query, a symbolic executor first attempts to resolve it through exact graph operations; only when symbolic execution abstains is an LLM invoked for semantic reasoning. For these unresolved queries, query-conditioned graph retrieval and evidence filtering preserve relation direction, temporal locality, and object semantics, providing the LLM with compact and verified task-relevant evidence. This design shifts the role of the LLM from a universal reasoning engine to a targeted semantic reasoner, while allowing deterministic computation to be handled exactly and efficiently. We evaluate the framework on 5,916 NuScenes-QA questions across all ten scenes of nuScenes v1.0-mini under an oracle-perception setting. The complete system achieves 80.63 percent overall accuracy with GPT-5.4-mini, improving over the corresponding LLM-only configuration by 5.48 percentage points; with DeepSeek-V4-Flash, the improvement reaches 6.64 points. The largest gains occur on counting questions, with improvements of 10.20 and 12.61 points, respectively. These results show that selective reasoning improves both accuracy and inference efficiency.
Sources
- Longformer: The Long-Document Transformer
- ConceptGraphs: Open-Vocabulary 3D Scene Graphs for Perception and Planning
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Graphs (GraphRAG)
- RouteLLM: Learning to Route LLMs with Preference Data
- NuScenes-QA: A Multi-modal Visual Question Answering Benchmark for Autonomous Driving Scenario
- DriveLM: Driving with Graph Visual Question Answering
- DriveVLM: The Convergence of Autonomous Driving and Large Vision-Language Models
Related papers
- MAVEN-T: Reinforced Heterogeneous Distillation for Real-Time Multi-Agent Trajectory Prediction
- Model Discovery Agent: LLM-assisted Bayesian experiment design for data-efficient discovery of mechanistic world models
- Agents' Last Exam
- The Clinician's Veto: Navigating Trust, Liability, and Uncertainty in Autonomous AI Prescribing
- MindHelper: Closed-Loop Embodied Mental-State Reasoning for Precision Intervention
- Incumbent Advantage: Brand Bias and Cognitive Manipulation Dynamics in LLM Recommendation Systems