The Alignment Paradox: How Post-Training Amplifies Confident Hallucinations in Language Models
cs.CL, cs.AI
Submitted: 2026-09-26
Updated: 2026-09-26
Comments: Code: https://github.com/star5o/HCE
Code: https://github.com/star5o/HCE
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Large language models (LLMs) can produce factually incorrect answers with high confidence, undermining their reliability and limiting the effectiveness of uncertainty-based error detection.
Terminology
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) can produce factually incorrect answers with high confidence, undermining their reliability and limiting the effectiveness of uncertainty-based error detection. While prior research attributes confident hallucinations to factors such as missing knowledge in training data, reasoning errors, or stochastic decoding, we uncover that post-training alignment itself is a primary driver of these errors, a phenomenon we call the Alignment Paradox. Across five model families evaluated on factual benchmarks, unaligned base models produce few high-confidence errors on long-tail factual queries, whereas instruction-tuned models multiply high-confidence errors (p 0.95) by more than an order of magnitude (10 times to 35 times). Layer-wise probing with the Logit Lens reveals that this overconfidence emerges in late layers, where wrong-answer margins expand past 4.0 points after remaining near zero across early and intermediate layers. These findings motivate limiting margin growth during post-training. We implement this principle through an entropy-dependent margin bound in direct preference optimization (DPO). In multi-epoch experiments with Mistral-7B, the bounded objective reduces high-confidence errors by up to 35.3% relative to standard DPO while maintaining performance on evaluated general reasoning benchmarks. These results show that bounded margins mitigate confident hallucinations during post-training.
Sources
- Concrete Problems in AI Safety
- Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
- Eliciting Latent Predictions from Transformers with the Tuned Lens
- Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challenge
- Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems
- The Llama 3 Herd of Models
- KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization
- Mistral 7B
- Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Know
- DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models
- Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models
- Qwen2 Technical Report
Related papers
- Exploring Solution Divergence and Its Effect on Large Language Model Problem Solving
- Ishigaki-IDS-Bench: A Benchmark for Generating Information Delivery Specification from BIM Information Requirements
- Subliminal Steering: Stronger Encoding of Hidden Signals
- MedStruct-S: A Benchmark for Key Discovery, Key-Conditioned QA and Semi-Structured Extraction from OCR Clinical Reports
- The End of Transformers? On Challenging Attention and the Rise of Sub-Quadratic Architectures
- Untangling the Mechanisms of Misleading Context in Medical Question Answering