PriceBench: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Price, Quality, and Brand Preferences in LLM Booking Agents
econ.GN, cs.AI, cs.CL, q-fin.EC
Submitted: 2026-09-25
Updated: 2026-09-25
Comments: Accepted to EMNLP 2026 Industry Track. 19 pages, 10 figures, 6 tables. Code and data: https://github.com/Pashasan/pricebench-emnlp
Code: https://github.com/Pashasan/pricebench-emnlp
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: LLMs increasingly act as purchasing agents, which makes the LLM, not the user, the one choosing among the options that satisfy a request; its preferences quietly fix what gets bought and what it
Terminology
Abstract
LLMs increasingly act as purchasing agents, which makes the LLM, not the user, the one choosing among the options that satisfy a request; its preferences quietly fix what gets bought and what it costs. Hotel booking is a clean instance: a high-volume choice settled on a few comparable attributes, where the pick reveals those preferences. We introduce PriceBench, a diagnostic benchmark that recovers an LLM's price, quality, and brand preferences from its booking choices with a logit choice model, applied to 28 LLMs from 8 providers on 3,600 hotel tasks from 179 real New York City properties. We find that capability is associated with how consistently an LLM chooses, not with what it chooses: more capable LLMs hold stronger, more consistent preferences, while weaker ones either lock onto one position, exploitable by whoever controls listing order, or choose almost indifferently. What those preferences favor varies sharply across providers and even within one family: price sensitivity spans more than an order of magnitude, and the price/quality trade-off moves mean booked nightly price from 247 to 393 on identical tasks. What an agent buys must therefore be measured per LLM, not inferred, and we release the tasks, code, and all 28 response sets.
Sources
- Magentic Marketplace: An Open-Source Environment for Studying Agentic Markets
- Algorithmic Collusion by Large Language Models
- EconEvals: Benchmarks and Litmus Tests for Economic Decision-Making by LLM Agents
- The Challenge of Using LLMs to Simulate Human Behavior: A Causal Inference Perspective
- Large Language Models as Simulated Economic Agents: What Can We Learn from Homo Silicus?
- LLM economicus? Mapping the Behavioral Biases of LLMs via Utility Theory
- TravelPlanner: A Benchmark for Real-World Planning with Language Agents
- $\tau$-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains
- Large Language Models Are Not Robust Multiple Choice Selectors
- Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena
- WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agents
Related papers
- How optimistic inflow forecasts distort dispatch, prices, and contracts in hydro-dominated power systems: evidence from Brazil
- The Economics of AI Inference: Inflation Dynamics, Welfare Costs, and Optimal Monetary Policy under the Inference-Cost Phillips Curve
- AI Economist Agent: An Agentic Framework for Evidence-Based Economic and Financial Analysis with RAG, Knowledge Graphs, and Large Language Models
- The Economics of Model Collapse: Equilibrium, Welfare, and Optimal Provenance Subsidies in Synthetic Data Markets
- Is Decentralized Finance Actually Decentralized? An Interdisciplinary Framework Integrating Network Theory, Agent-Based Simulation, and Longitudinal Evidence from Aave, GHO Issuance, and Cross-Chain Expansion
- Delphos: A reinforcement learning framework for assisting discrete choice model specification