The Fellowship of the Query: Learning Retrieval Actions
cs.IR, cs.AI, cs.CL, cs.LG
Submitted: 2026-09-23
Updated: 2026-09-23
Code: https://github.com/padas-lab-de/agent-action-controller
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Retrieval-augmented question answering requires control decisions about when to decompose a question, search, reformulate, extract evidence, synthesize facts, verify progress, and stop.
Terminology
Abstract
Retrieval-augmented question answering requires control decisions about when to decompose a question, search, reformulate, extract evidence, synthesize facts, verify progress, and stop. We study whether trajectory fine-tuning can improve small language models (SLMs) as next-action controllers. We additionally evaluate a low-resource setting in which a single SLM serves as both the controller and the final-answer generator. From accepted teacher search traces, we build a seven-way action-prediction task, where the model predicts the next structured teacher action from the current trajectory state, and evaluate LoRA-supervised fine-tuning across SLMs and xSLMs as controllers. On 1,646 held-out action examples, Granite 4.1 3B trained on 13,194 actions reaches macro-F1 0.6536, compared with 0.1736 for zero-shot prompting of the same model and 0.5399 for a TF-IDF logistic-regression baseline. In an end-to-end controller/generator swap evaluation over 149 held-out trajectories, using the fine-tuned model for both roles improves Exact Match from 0.7530 to 0.7946 and token F1 from 0.7783 to 0.8295 compared with using the base model as both controller and generator. The cross-role conditions show that the fine-tuned controller increases evidence-fact recording when the generator is fixed, while controller-only final-answer gains are not statistically clear. Overall, trajectory supervision improves action prediction and evidence-recording behaviour in this evaluated pipeline. Code is available at https://github.com/padas-lab-de/agent-action-controller
Sources
- MiniCPM-V 4.5: Cooking Efficient MLLMs via Architecture, Data, and Training Recipe
- LFM2 Technical Report
- Lessons from the Trenches on Reproducible Evaluation of Language Models
- RQ-RAG: Learning to Refine Queries for Retrieval Augmented Generation
- Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challenge
- Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learning
- Fact, Fetch, and Reason: A Unified Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation
- Ministral 3
- Augmented Language Models: a Survey
- MiniCPM4: Ultra-Efficient LLMs on End Devices
- SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
- Qwen3 Technical Report
- MiniCPM-V: A GPT-4V Level MLLM on Your Phone
Related papers
- The Price of Isolation: Estimating the Ecosystem Cost of Symmetric Two-Sided A/B Testing
- SCAR: Semantic Continuity-Aware Retrieval for Efficient Context Expansion in RAG
- MixLoRA-DSI: Dynamically Expandable Mixture-of-LoRA Experts for Rehearsal-Free Generative Retrieval over Dynamic Corpora
- How Do LLM-Generated Texts Impact Term-Based Retrieval Models?
- MemSyco-Bench: Benchmarking Sycophancy in Agent Memory
- From a Large-Scale Teacher to Efficient Multimodal Students for Search Relevance Prediction