Evaluating Feedback Focus and Pedagogical Adaptivity in LLM-Generated Feedback on Student Writing

arXiv:2609.28026 · cs.CL, cs.AI · Submitted 2026-09-23 · Read on arXiv

cs.CL, cs.AI

Submitted: 2026-09-23

Updated: 2026-09-23

Comments: Accepted at AIME-Con 2026. Camera-ready version

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: We investigate whether state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) generate feedback that reflects the pedagogical practices of expert teachers in terms of feedback focus and adaptivity.

Terminology

Abstract

We investigate whether state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) generate feedback that reflects the pedagogical practices of expert teachers in terms of feedback focus and adaptivity. Previous evaluation efforts have examined feedback characteristics, its impact on learning, and its target, yet the focus of feedback and its adaptivity remains largely overlooked. To bridge this gap, we adopt and refine Narciss's taxonomy into seven feedback focus types to annotate teacher and LLM-generated feedback across three university writing courses. We release FeedType, a benchmark containing annotated teacher and LLM feedback from six LLMs under three prompting strategies. We assess the coverage and distribution of feedback focus types, and examine whether LLMs adapt their feedback across draft stages and student performance levels as an expert instructor does. Our findings show that while most LLMs cover most feedback focus types, they fail to reflect teacher feedback distributions and show varying levels of adaptivity, with none matching the teachers' adaptive behavior. We believe FeedType will support future research on pedagogical alignment in LLM feedback generation.

Sources

Related papers