Sharpening the Ensemble: An SSIM-Aligned Residual Refiner for Brain-MRI Inpainting Post-Processing
cs.CV, cs.LG
Submitted: 2026-09-03
Updated: 2026-09-03
Comments: Accepted at the MICCAI BraTS Local Synthesis of Brain Tissue Inpainting Challenge (Task 4), MICCAI 2026. 12 pages, 2 figures
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Brain-MRI inpainting replaces a masked region of a scan with synthesized, anatomically plausible healthy tissue, so that analysis tools built for healthy brains can be applied to images they would
Terminology
Abstract
Brain-MRI inpainting replaces a masked region of a scan with synthesized, anatomically plausible healthy tissue, so that analysis tools built for healthy brains can be applied to images they would otherwise reject. On the BraTS local-synthesis benchmark, which ranks submissions on the structural similarity index (SSIM), the peak signal-to-noise ratio, and the mean squared error (MSE) jointly, the strongest recent models are accurate, but several report blurry synthesized regions and attribute this to the mean-seeking behavior of the 1 and MSE terms in their training losses. We address this in post-processing, forming a deep ensemble of the two co-first-place 2025 models and training a lightweight residual refiner on the ensemble's own outputs under an 1 loss augmented with a structural-similarity term whose weight λ we vary. At a moderate λ the refiner improves SSIM over the ensemble, from 0.8767 to 0.8780 on a held-out reproduction of the official scorer and from 0.8555 to 0.8572 on the official validation leaderboard, with essentially no change in MSE. The gain is small but consistent, improving 62.6% of the held-out cases with a signed-rank p=2.2 times10-7, whereas over-weighting the structural term reverses it. Two ablations bound the effect. Adding any third model to the two-model ensemble degrades it, and classical unsharp masking fails to improve SSIM at any strength (best 0.8765 against 0.8767), so the gain reflects learned rather than indiscriminate sharpening. The result is a cheap, reproducible post-processing stage that improves an already strong ensemble without any large-scale retraining.
Sources
- The RSNA-ASNR-MICCAI BraTS 2021 Benchmark on Brain Tumor Segmentation and Radiogenomic Classification
- MONAI: An open-source framework for deep learning in healthcare
- The Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) Challenge: Local Synthesis of Healthy Brain Tissue via Inpainting
- Post-Processing Methods for Improving Accuracy in MRI Inpainting
- Analysis of the BraTS 2023 Intracranial Meningioma Segmentation Challenge
- U-Net Based Healthy 3D Brain Tissue Inpainting
- Robust 3D Brain MRI Inpainting with Random Masking Augmentation
Related papers
- Loss Knows Best: Detecting Annotation Errors in Videos via Loss Trajectories
- AnchorWeave: World-Consistent Video Generation with Retrieved Local Spatial Memories
- Benchmarking the Robustness of Foundation Models for Mammography under Domain Shift
- MambaX-Net: Dual-Input Mamba-Enhanced Cross-Attention Network for Longitudinal MRI Segmentation
- TeleOCR: Navigating Document Parsing Across Digital and Camera-Captured Documents
- A Survey on Efficient Vision-Language-Action Models