Accountable AI with Grounded, Faithful, Consistent, Actionable Rationales: A Case Study in Clinical Trial Matching with VERDICT
cs.CL, cs.CY, cs.LO
Submitted: 2026-09-03
Updated: 2026-09-03
Comments: Accepted to EMNLP 2026 (Main Conference). 46 pages, 6 figures, 28 tables. Code and prompts: https://github.com/stanford-oval/clinical-trial-matching
Code: https://github.com/stanford-oval/clinical-trial-matching
License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Terminology
Sources
- GPT-4 Technical Report
- GPT-4o System Card
- Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
- LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generations
- Qwen2.5 Technical Report
- OpenAI GPT-5 System Card
Related papers
- Exploring Solution Divergence and Its Effect on Large Language Model Problem Solving
- Ishigaki-IDS-Bench: A Benchmark for Generating Information Delivery Specification from BIM Information Requirements
- Subliminal Steering: Stronger Encoding of Hidden Signals
- MedStruct-S: A Benchmark for Key Discovery, Key-Conditioned QA and Semi-Structured Extraction from OCR Clinical Reports
- The End of Transformers? On Challenging Attention and the Rise of Sub-Quadratic Architectures
- Untangling the Mechanisms of Misleading Context in Medical Question Answering