Can LLMs Use Relational Transformer Embeddings?

arXiv:2609.00457 · cs.LG · Submitted 2026-08-31 · Read on arXiv

cs.LG

Submitted: 2026-08-31

Updated: 2026-08-31

Comments: Accepted at the 2nd Foundation Models for Structured Data Workshop at ICML 2026, Seoul, South Korea. OpenReview: https://openreview.net/forum?id=Z2n7WcIy6j&noteId=Z2n7WcIy6j

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: Injecting frozen relational-encoder embeddings as soft tokens into a large language model (LLM) is a conceptually appealing fusion strategy: the encoder handles multi-table structure, the LLM handles

Terminology

Abstract

Injecting frozen relational-encoder embeddings as soft tokens into a large language model (LLM) is a conceptually appealing fusion strategy: the encoder handles multi-table structure, the LLM handles language and reasoning, and no lossy text serialization is required. We test this hypothesis concretely by injecting embeddings from a frozen Relational Transformer (RT) into Qwen3.5-4B via a learned MLP projection and LoRA adaptation, trained first with supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on chain-of-thought reasoning traces and then with group-based reinforcement learning (GSPO). We evaluate across 10 binary classification tasks on 6 relational databases from RelBench, under four supervision regimes: single-task (ST), within-dataset (WD), cross-dataset (CD), and all-task (ALL). The hybrid model does not consistently outperform standalone RT: it is frequently below random, highly sensitive to serialization format and relational-token budget, and unstable under RL training. We report these negative results and analyze the failure modes, arguing that soft-token fusion requires stronger alignment objectives and schema-aware design before it can serve as a reliable route to relational prediction.

Sources

Related papers