Low-Resource Preference Adaptation of LLMs via Activation-Based Label Propagation
cs.CL
Submitted: 2026-08-31
Updated: 2026-08-31
Comments: EMNLP26 Main
Code: https://github.com/alessioGalatolo/activ-pref-probe
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Adapting large language models to user-specific preferences is often constrained by the cost of human annotation, making preference optimisation impractical in low-resource settings where preferences
Terminology
Abstract
Adapting large language models to user-specific preferences is often constrained by the cost of human annotation, making preference optimisation impractical in low-resource settings where preferences cannot be reliably labelled by LLMs themselves, e.g., due to cultural, subjective, or personalised contexts. In this paper, we investigate how language models encode preference information in their intermediate representations, finding that activations from chosen and rejected responses form distinct clusters across layers, even in pretrained models. Strikingly, this structure is strengthened by alignment on canonical datasets but erased when the target preferences differ from those the model was aligned on, suggesting aligned LLMs are poor judges for non-mainstream populations. Exploiting this structure, we propose training a lightweight linear probe on a few labelled preference pairs (at most 500) and using it to annotate large unlabelled datasets (50K+) for downstream preference optimisation. We systematically evaluate this approach across different datasets, preference optimisation methods and model scales and find that our method consistently outperforms direct training given the same annotation budget, and remains competitive against baselines trained on 50-100 times more labelled data in the majority of our settings. Code is available at https://github.com/alessioGalatolo/activ-pref-probe.
Sources
- A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignment
- Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
- Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback
- No Answer Needed: Predicting LLM Answer Accuracy from Question-Only Linear Probes
- UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedback
- Toy Models of Superposition
- Gemma 3 Technical Report
- The Llama 3 Herd of Models
- Qwen2.5 Technical Report
- Qwen3 Technical Report
- Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models
- Response Uncertainty and Probe Modeling: Two Sides of the Same Coin in LLM Interpretability?
Related papers
- Exploring Solution Divergence and Its Effect on Large Language Model Problem Solving
- Ishigaki-IDS-Bench: A Benchmark for Generating Information Delivery Specification from BIM Information Requirements
- Subliminal Steering: Stronger Encoding of Hidden Signals
- MedStruct-S: A Benchmark for Key Discovery, Key-Conditioned QA and Semi-Structured Extraction from OCR Clinical Reports
- The End of Transformers? On Challenging Attention and the Rise of Sub-Quadratic Architectures
- Untangling the Mechanisms of Misleading Context in Medical Question Answering