DINOspec: Efficient Multimodal Alignment of Vision and Spectral Foundation Models for Astronomy
Listen
Radio episode about this paper
Transcript
Introduction to the show: ident: Astrophysics. The day in astrophysics: observations, models and what the data forces.
Vera: We're looking at the paper: "DINOspec: Efficient Multimodal Alignment of Vision and Spectral Foundation Models for Astronomy".
Jocelyn: Here's the gist of the paper. Astronomical observations provide multimodal views of physical systems, with images and spectra capturing complementary properties of celestial objects.
Vera: DINOspec improves galaxy morphology classification (F1: 0.72→0.78) and spectral classification (F1: 0.70→0.74) while training at most 21M parameters.
Jocelyn: The core problem addressed is the difficulty in combining representations learned by separate vision and spectral models.
Vera: Existing multimodal architectures typically rely on jointly trained modality-specific components, particularly tokenizers optimized for the statistics of the training data.
Paper summary: Vera: So, looking at "DINOspec: Efficient Multimodal Alignment of Vision and Spectral Foundation Models for Astronomy", the authors are showing how to align separate vision and spectral models using lightweight adapters trained on paired astronomical data without retraining the main encoders.
Jocelyn: The paper emphasizes that this method allows us to reuse existing foundation models, which is important because it means we don't have to spend enormous compute time rebuilding them just for a new data type.
Subrahmanyan: The authors suggest that representation learning and cross-modal alignment can be separated, providing a framework for connecting independently developed scientific foundation models through these small alignment modules, each containing only about ten six parameters.
Vera: It boils down to this: if you have strong unimodal representations already, you don't necessarily need to jointly train large multimodal encoders; you can achieve domain adaptation through these lightweight alignment modules.
Jocelyn: The success of using DINOv3 as the vision backbone suggests that we might not always need completely new, domain-specific encoders if the alignment mechanism is strong enough to bridge the gap.
Subrahmanyan: This gives us a concrete way to think about composing independently trained models for astronomy, which is really useful when we want to leverage knowledge from different instruments or datasets.
Conclusion: Vera: So, DINOspec is about taking two separate models, one for seeing images and one for looking at spectra, and figuring out how to make them talk to each other without retraining everything from scratch.
Jocelyn: It’s about this alignment mechanism using adapters so we can reuse those pre-trained components instead of building entirely new ones.
Subrahmanyan: The authors are focusing on separating the representation learning from the cross-modal alignment, which is a way to make these foundation models work together.
Vera: They use a frozen vision backbone, specifically DINOv3 Large, and connect it to a spectral branch using trainable adapters trained with CLIP loss.
Jocelyn: The paper shows that this lightweight adapter approach only uses about seven percent of the parameters of a full multimodal model to achieve this alignment.
Subrahmanyan: That’s significant because it means you can combine independently developed vision and spectral models without needing a massive, jointly trained multimodal encoder.
Vera: The results show improvements in galaxy morphology classification and spectral classification when the data from both modalities are complementary.
Jocelyn: But the paper also points out that if one modality already has the main signal for a task, like redshift prediction, alignment doesn't add much extra info there.
Subrahmanyan: So it seems the real win here is for tasks where seeing an object and seeing its light tells you different things but both pieces of data are needed.
Vera: The implication is that we don't always have to build one huge, monolithic multimodal model if we can use these small alignment modules to bridge the gap.
Jocelyn: It opens up a new path for connecting different scientific models, letting us leverage existing work from various instruments and surveys.
Subrahmanyan: This moves toward a framework where domain adaptation happens through these small modules rather than needing entirely new encoders for every single application.
Vera: And it sets the stage for seeing how this idea applies to other astronomical observations beyond just images and spectra, right?
University of Geneva
astro-ph.IM
Submitted: 2026-08-31
Updated: 2026-10-28
Comments: 5 pages, 1 figure, accepted to NeurIPS Representations for the Physical Sciences Workshop
Code: https://github.com/henrysky/Galaxy10
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Importance score: 89/100
The gist: Astronomical observations provide multimodal views of physical systems, with images and spectra capturing complementary properties of celestial objects.
Key concepts
- Representation Learning Separation
- The core idea is to learn visual and spectral features independently first. Instead of training one large model, DINOspec allows vision and spectral encoders to be developed separately. This separation enables the reuse of these independently trained models for other tasks, which is crucial for scientific foundation models.
- Adapter-Based Alignment
- This mechanism connects the separate vision and spectral branches using small, trainable adapters. These adapters use a symmetric cross-entropy CLIP loss to force the visual and spectral representations to align in a shared space without retraining the entire large backbone. This keeps the model lightweight.
- Cross-Modal Contrastive Training
- The models are aligned using a CLIP-style contrastive training objective. This involves training on paired astronomical images and spectra from the same objects. The goal is to teach the encoders that visual and spectral data corresponding to the same galaxy should have similar representations, effectively bridging the gap between different data types.
Terminology
Summary
Astronomical observations provide multimodal views of physical systems, with images and spectra capturing complementary properties of celestial objects. DINOspec improves galaxy morphology classification (F1: 0.72→0.78) and spectral classification (F1: 0.70→0.74) while training at most 21M parameters.
The core problem addressed is the difficulty in combining representations learned by separate vision and spectral models. Existing multimodal architectures typically rely on jointly trained modality-specific components, particularly tokenizers optimized for the statistics of the training data. The central challenge for scientific foundation models is that representations learned from different instruments or datasets are difficult to reuse and combine. This separation allows representation learning from cross-modal alignment, enabling the use of existing foundation models without modifying their learned representations.
Model Structure and Alignment Mechanism
DINOspec adopts a structure consisting of a frozen DINOv3-Large vision backbone and a spectral branch operating on tokens from the frozen AION-1 tokenizer. The vision branch appends transformer blocks to the DINOv3 output, while the spectral branch uses either a linear embedding layer or additional transformer blocks. The two branches are connected through trainable adapters, which align visual and spectral representations using the symmetric cross-entropy CLIP loss.
Experimental Setup and Data Utilization
The study utilizes paired imaging and spectroscopic observations of the same astrophysical objects. Image data originate from the Hyper Suprime-Cam (HSC) survey, providing calibrated optical imaging in five bands. Optical spectra were sourced from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), with a combined dataset containing 209630 object spectra. Cross-matched HSC and DESI objects within a one arcsecond radius were constructed to obtain a dataset containing 20,472 galaxies. These paired observations are used for CLIP-style contrastive training to align image and spectrum data in a shared representation space.
Performance Analysis and Key Findings
DINOspec demonstrates that representation learning and cross-modal alignment can be separated, allowing independently developed foundation models to be reused. Improvements in morphology and spectral classification show alignment is most effective when modalities contain complementary information about the physical object. Conversely, unchanged redshift prediction demonstrates that alignment does not provide additional information when one modality already contains the dominant signal for a task. Visual galaxy morphology classification is the task that benefits most from multimodal joint training.
Conclusion and Future Implications
Adapter-based alignment using at most 7% the parameters of a full multimodal model successfully combines independently pre-trained vision and spectral models while preserving their individual capabilities. DINOspec extends representation alignment methods to astronomical observations, providing a framework for connecting independently developed scientific foundation models through alignment modules each containing only O(10 6) parameters. The success of DINOv3 as a vision backbone suggests that domain-specific encoders are not always required; instead, domain adaptation can be achieved through the alignment modules. The paper concludes that representation learning and cross-modal alignment can be separated to reuse independently developed foundation models.
Appendix Details
The dataset construction details are summarized in Table 4, which lists the datasets used in this study. Adapter pre-training involved optionally pre-training additional transformer blocks using the DINOv3 self-distillation objective on the HSC dataset for vision adapters and a masked-token prediction objective analogous to the BERT objective for spectral adapters. Joint training was performed on paired image–spectrum observations using a symmetric cross-entropy CLIP objective. Evaluation involved seven repetitions with different random seeds to ensure robustness. The final results show that the DINOspec model achieves an F1 score of 0.78 for galaxy morphology classification and an R2 score of approximately 0.9 for spectroscopic redshift prediction. The results show that lightweight alignment can improve downstream performance without jointly training large multimodal encoders, provided sufficiently strong unimodal representations exist.
Table Summary
Table 7 summarizes performance across image and spectral tasks, comparing DINOspec against DINOv3 and AION-1 baselines. The results indicate that the vision backbone alone achieves an F1 score of 0.722 ± 5.2 × 10−3 for morphology classification. The AION-1 model achieves an R2 score of approximately 0.9 for redshift prediction. The overall findings suggest that representation alignment is a viable method for composing independently pre-trained scientific foundation models.
References
The references listed include works such as AstroCLIP [Parker et al., 2024], AstroM3 [Rizhko and Bloom, 2025], and AION-1 [Parker et al., 2025]. Other cited works include DINOv3 [Siméoni et al., 2025] and AstroCLIP [Parker et al., 2024]. The reference list is extensive, including works by Ahumada et al. [Aihara et al., 2018], Collaboration et al. [DESI Collaboration, 2016], and others. The references cover a wide range of astronomical and machine learning literature. The reference list is extensive, including works by Ahumada et al. [Aihara et al., 2018], Collaboration et al. [DESI Collaboration, 2016], and others. The references cover a wide range of astronomical and machine learning literature. The reference list is extensive, including works by Ahumada et al. [Aihara et al., 2018], Collaboration et al. [DESI Collaboration, 2016], and others. The references cover a wide range of astronomical and machine learning literature. The reference list is extensive, including works by Ahumada et al. [Aihara et al., 2018], Collaboration et al. [DESI Collaboration, 2016], and others. The references cover a wide range of astronomical and machine learning literature. The reference list is extensive, including works by Ahumada et al. [Aihara et al., 2018], Collaboration et al. [DESI Collaboration, 2016], and others. The references cover a wide range of astronomical and machine learning literature. The reference list is extensive, including works by Ahumada et al. [Aihara et al., 2018], Collaboration et al. [DESI Collaboration, 2016], and others. The references cover a wide range of astronomical and machine learning literature <ref:2608.
Improvements for AI systems
-
Representation Alignment for Scientific Foundation Models: The DINOspec framework can align frozen vision encoders with pre-trained spectral tokenizers using lightweight adapters and contrastive learning to combine independently learned representations without retraining their encoders. This allows reusing existing foundation models for multimodal tasks, improving galaxy morphology classification from F1 0.72 to 0.78 and spectral classification from F1 0.70 to 0.74 while training at most 21 million parameters.
-
Asymmetric Knowledge Transfer Tuning: By varying the initialization and capacity of the trainable adapters, DINOspec can investigate
asymmetric knowledge transfer between frozen encoders by varying the initialisation and capacity of the trainable adapters,
revealing when unimodal information already dominates a downstream task versus when multimodal alignment improves scientific representations. -
Efficient Multimodal Composition: DINOspec provides a framework for connecting independently developed scientific foundation models through alignment modules each containing only O(106) parameters, successfully combining pre-trained vision and spectral models while preserving their individual capabilities with at most 7% of the full multimodal model parameters.
-
Domain Adaptation via Alignment Modules: The system demonstrates that
domain adaptation can be achieved through the alignment modules, although this may require additional trainable capacity,
suggesting that domain-specific encoders are not always required for scientific tasks like galaxy morphology classification.
Abstract
Astronomical observations provide multimodal views of physical systems, with images and spectra capturing complementary properties of celestial objects. Scientific foundation models can learn powerful representations from these observations, but representations learned by separate models remain difficult to combine. We investigate whether laten space representations learned by separate vision and spectral models can be aligned without retraining their encoders. We introduce DINOspec, a multimodal framework that aligns a frozen DINOv3 image encoder with a pre-trained AION-1 spectral encoder using lightweight adapters and contrastive learning on 20,472 paired images and spectra of astronomical objects. DINOspec improves galaxy morphology classification (F1: 0.72 to 0.78) and spectral type classification (F1: 0.70 to 0.74) while training at few as 21M parameters. Redshift prediction shows no consistent improvement over the AION-1 baseline of R 2 about0.9, demonstrating that potential benefits of alignment depends on the configuration and downstream task. These results provide an empirical study of composing astronomical representations from independently pretrained foundation models through lightweight alignment modules.
Sources
- The DESI Experiment Part I: Science,Targeting, and Survey Design
- DINOv2 Meets Text: A Unified Framework for Image- and Pixel-Level Vision-Language Alignment
- AstroCLIP: A Cross-Modal Foundation Model for Galaxies
- AION-1: Omnimodal Foundation Model for Astronomical Sciences
- DINOv3
Related papers
- Unified matched-filter and excess-power pipeline for gravitational-wave detector characterization
- Ushering in sub-arcsecond angular resolution observatories in the far-infrared: The case for a double-Fourier interferometer
- A design concept for the High Resolution Imager on the Habitable Worlds Observatory
- Community Lessons from builders of infrared multi-object spectrographs
- Revisiting the Unknown Unknowns in Transient Astrophysics with the SKA Telescopes
- Setting requirements on out-of-band rejection for next-generation CMB experiments. Application to the LiteBIRD instrument