From Security Events to Conflict States: A Three-layer Cyber Defense Scenario Model for Enhanced Cyber Situational Awareness
cs.CR
Submitted: 2026-08-27
Updated: 2026-08-27
Comments: 18 pages, 3 figures, 1 table, paper in proceedings of The International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, ARES 2026 in Linkoping, Sweden, August 24-27, 2026
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-35579-9_20
Code: https://github.com/requenams/mission-oriented-cyber-defense-netlogo
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
The gist: Cyber defense in mission-critical environments requires integrated approaches capable of representing adversarial progression, defender-side uncertainty, mission impact, and defensive decision
Terminology
Abstract
Cyber defense in mission-critical environments requires integrated approaches capable of representing adversarial progression, defender-side uncertainty, mission impact, and defensive decision support within a unified framework. In operational domains, defenders must continuously estimate the evolving security posture while preserving the continuity and integrity of mission-critical functions under incomplete and noisy observations. This paper presents a mission-oriented cyber-defense framework for Cyber Situational Awareness (CSA) and decision support based on a three-layer integrated probabilistic model and an executable simulation prototype. The model combines: (i) an attack-graph model that represents possible adversarial progression through mission-relevant assets, (ii) an event model that transforms observed telemetry into posterior defender beliefs through Bayesian inference, and (iii) a state model that abstracts the inferred posture into conflict states and mission-risk levels. These components are connected to a one-step defensive action rule that balances estimated residual mission risk and operational cost. The framework is instantiated in a NetLogo agent-based simulation of an operational environment structured across the Tactical Edge Zone (TEZ), Mission Operations Zone (MOZ), and Enterprise Support Zone (ESZ). The proposal is assessed through mathematical consistency analysis, local robustness assessment under telemetry perturbations, and representative simulation traces. Results indicate that the framework and its implementation preserve coherent relationships between attack progression, telemetry-driven uncertainty management, mission-impact assessment, and cost-aware defensive decision support guided by mission-risk prioritization.
Related papers
- SoK: AI-Augmented Binary Reversing
- Relaxed Sender Anonymity for CBDC Interbank Settlement: A Zero-Knowledge Approach on Permissioned EVM
- Calibration-Family Overfit: Why Trusted Sabotage Monitors Don't Transfer Across Lineages
- Estimating the Social Cost of Corporate Data Breaches
- Efficient Fuzzy PSI under One-Sided Assumptions
- Sealing the Audit-Runtime Gap for LLM Skills