DSA: Evidence-Aware LLM-Agent Orchestration for Multi-Market Stock Research
cs.AI, cs.MA
Submitted: 2026-08-27
Updated: 2026-08-27
Comments: 6 pages, 2 figures, 3 tables. Code available at https://github.com/ZhuLinsen/daily_stock_analysis
Code: https://github.com/ZhuLinsen/daily_stock_analysis
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Large language models can summarize financial information, but an operational stock-research system must first assemble heterogeneous evidence, expose unavailable data and model capabilities, and
Terminology
Abstract
Large language models can summarize financial information, but an operational stock-research system must first assemble heterogeneous evidence, expose unavailable data and model capabilities, and control how generated opinions affect a final report. We present DSA, an evidence-aware orchestration framework for multi-market stock research with large language model (LLM) agents. DSA organizes the workflow into evidence acquisition, structured context construction, model-routed analysis, optional role and Strategy Skill reasoning, and report generation with selected context and diagnostics. A default report profile and an optional agentic profile share evidence and model-routing services but use profile-specific output validation and risk safeguards. In the agentic profile, core role outputs are processed by role-specific parsers, whereas Strategy Skill opinions undergo an additional signal-eligibility partition before synthesis; disagreement is supplied explicitly to the decision agent, followed by a conservative risk override. The reference implementation includes six regional market paths, fifteen bundled Strategy Skills, hosted and local model routes, and multiple execution and delivery surfaces. At a frozen software snapshot, a selected manifest of 1,457 portable offline backend contract tests passed; 596 cases were retrospectively mapped to six contract families central to the reported LLM-agent architecture. This evidence establishes implementation conformance for the tested software contracts, not superior report quality, forecasting accuracy, or investment returns.
Sources
- FinGPT: Open-Source Financial Large Language Models
- ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models
- A Multimodal Foundation Agent for Financial Trading: Tool-Augmented, Diversified, and Generalist
- FinMem: A Performance-Enhanced LLM Trading Agent with Layered Memory and Character Design
- FinRobot: An Open-Source AI Agent Platform for Financial Applications using Large Language Models
- FinCon: A Synthesized LLM Multi-Agent System with Conceptual Verbal Reinforcement for Enhanced Financial Decision Making
- TradingAgents: Multi-Agents LLM Financial Trading Framework
- FinRL: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Library for Automated Stock Trading in Quantitative Finance
- FinRL-Meta: Market Environments and Benchmarks for Data-Driven Financial Reinforcement Learning
- AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversation
- AgentScope: A Flexible yet Robust Multi-Agent Platform
- AlphaAgents: Large Language Model based Multi-Agents for Equity Portfolio Constructions
- FinToolBench: Evaluating LLM Agents for Real-World Financial Tool Use
- Agentic Trading: When LLM Agents Meet Financial Markets
Related papers
- MAVEN-T: Reinforced Heterogeneous Distillation for Real-Time Multi-Agent Trajectory Prediction
- Model Discovery Agent: LLM-assisted Bayesian experiment design for data-efficient discovery of mechanistic world models
- Agents' Last Exam
- The Clinician's Veto: Navigating Trust, Liability, and Uncertainty in Autonomous AI Prescribing
- MindHelper: Closed-Loop Embodied Mental-State Reasoning for Precision Intervention
- Incumbent Advantage: Brand Bias and Cognitive Manipulation Dynamics in LLM Recommendation Systems