DSA: Evidence-Aware LLM-Agent Orchestration for Multi-Market Stock Research

arXiv:2608.26990 · cs.AI, cs.MA · Submitted 2026-08-27 · Read on arXiv

cs.AI, cs.MA

Submitted: 2026-08-27

Updated: 2026-08-27

Comments: 6 pages, 2 figures, 3 tables. Code available at https://github.com/ZhuLinsen/daily_stock_analysis

Code: https://github.com/ZhuLinsen/daily_stock_analysis

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: Large language models can summarize financial information, but an operational stock-research system must first assemble heterogeneous evidence, expose unavailable data and model capabilities, and

Terminology

Abstract

Large language models can summarize financial information, but an operational stock-research system must first assemble heterogeneous evidence, expose unavailable data and model capabilities, and control how generated opinions affect a final report. We present DSA, an evidence-aware orchestration framework for multi-market stock research with large language model (LLM) agents. DSA organizes the workflow into evidence acquisition, structured context construction, model-routed analysis, optional role and Strategy Skill reasoning, and report generation with selected context and diagnostics. A default report profile and an optional agentic profile share evidence and model-routing services but use profile-specific output validation and risk safeguards. In the agentic profile, core role outputs are processed by role-specific parsers, whereas Strategy Skill opinions undergo an additional signal-eligibility partition before synthesis; disagreement is supplied explicitly to the decision agent, followed by a conservative risk override. The reference implementation includes six regional market paths, fifteen bundled Strategy Skills, hosted and local model routes, and multiple execution and delivery surfaces. At a frozen software snapshot, a selected manifest of 1,457 portable offline backend contract tests passed; 596 cases were retrospectively mapped to six contract families central to the reported LLM-agent architecture. This evidence establishes implementation conformance for the tested software contracts, not superior report quality, forecasting accuracy, or investment returns.

Sources

Related papers