The optimal redshift for dark energy I: formalism and interpretation
astro-ph.CO
Submitted: 2026-08-25
Updated: 2026-08-25
Comments: 13 pages, 2 figures
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: We introduce the concept of the optimal redshift for dark energy, a statistically motivated redshift at which departures of the dark-energy equation of state (EOS) from the cosmological-constant
Terminology
Abstract
We introduce the concept of the optimal redshift for dark energy, a statistically motivated redshift at which departures of the dark-energy equation of state (EOS) from the cosmological-constant value are tested most effectively. Within a generalized CPL parameterization, we derive an analytic expression for the optimal redshift by maximizing the separation of the EOS from w=-1 relative to the corresponding uncertainty. We establish the optimal redshift relationship to the phantom-crossing and pivot redshifts. As an illustration, we apply the formalism to the dataset combination of DESI DR2 BAO measurements, the DES Year-6 independent BAO measurement, and the recalibrated DES-Dovekie supernova sample. Adopting the null hypothesis H 0:w(a opt)=-1, we find a tension of 2.8σ with the cosmological-constant prediction at the optimal redshift, compared with 2.6σ at the pivot redshift, despite the latter having a smaller EOS uncertainty. This behavior reflects the specific design of the optimal redshift to maximize the statistical significance of a departure of the EOS from the-1 value of the Λ CDM model. We further provide statistical and geometrical interpretations of the optimum. In the CPL parameter space, the pivot corresponds to the projection that minimizes the variance of the equation of state, whereas the optimum maximizes its squared-distance from the cosmological-constant value over its variance. While the optimum is dataset and parameterization dependent, the underlying optimization principle and definition of the optimal redshift can be extended beyond the CPL framework. Future applications to DESI, Rubin LSST, Euclid, Roman Space Telescope, and other Stage-IV dark-energy surveys appear particularly promising.
Sources
- The Cosmological Constant
- The Cosmological Constant and Dark Energy
- Dynamics of dark energy
- Remarks on the formulation of the cosmological constant/dark energy problems
- DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological Constraints from the Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations
- DESI DR2 Results I: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations from the Lyman Alpha Forest
- DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints
- Extended Dark Energy analysis using DESI DR2 BAO measurements
- Cosmological implications of DESI DR2 BAO measurements in light of the latest ACT DR6 CMB data
- Quintessential interpretation of the evolving dark energy in light of DESI
- Dynamical dark energy in light of cosmic distance measurements II: a study using current observations
- Cosmic Clues: DESI, Dark Energy, and the Cosmological Constant Problem
- Model independent cosmographic constraints from DESI 2024
- Interpreting DESI's evidence for evolving dark energy
- Does DESI 2024 Confirm $\Lambda$CDM?
- The Self-Consistency of DESI Analysis and Comment on "Does DESI 2024 Confirm $\Lambda$CDM?"
- Quantifying Scalar Field Dynamics with DESI 2024 Y1 BAO measurements
- Dark energy in light of recent DESI BAO and Hubble tension
- The role of LRG1 and LRG2's monopole in inferring the DESI 2024 BAO cosmology
- Assessing observational constraints on dark energy
Related papers
- Angular clustering and bias of photometric quasars in the Kilo-Degree Survey Data Release 4
- A Novel kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Estimator for Electron-Electron Correlations
- Magnetic fields at the dawn of structure formation I. The CARLA J1510+5958 proto-cluster
- Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Weak Lensing and Galaxy Clustering Cosmological Analysis Framework
- Exploring the Impact of Systematic Bias in Type Ia Supernova Cosmology Across Diverse Dark Energy Parametrizations
- Non-Gaussian Galaxy Stochasticity and the Noise-Field Formulation