PROSLEX: A Novel Dataset for Expert-Annotated Legal Statute Prediction for Indian Judiciary
Subinay Adhikary, Upal Bhattacharya, Vivek Kumar Singh, Anurag Sharma, Shubham Kumar Nigam, Suvasis Das, Shouvik Kumar Guha, Koustav Rudra, Kripabandhu Ghosh
cs.AI
Submitted: 2026-08-09
Updated: 2026-08-11
Code: https://github.com/subinay494/Legal_Statute_Prediction_Explanation
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Legal Statute Prediction (LSP) involves automatically identifying relevant legal statutes given factual descriptions in legal documents, typically framed as a multi-label classification task within
Terminology
Abstract
Legal Statute Prediction (LSP) involves automatically identifying relevant legal statutes given factual descriptions in legal documents, typically framed as a multi-label classification task within natural language processing and information retrieval research. While recent advances have begun incorporating Large Language Models (LLMs) for statute prediction, current approaches primarily focus on accuracy metrics without addressing the critical need for legal reasoning, a fundamental requirement in judicial contexts where decisions must be explainable and justifiable. To address this research gap, we present PROSLEX (PRediction Of Statutes and LEgal eXplanation), a comprehensive dataset comprising 1,623 expert-annotated legal documents from the Indian context. Each document is paired with statute predictions and detailed explanations, totaling 7,450 explanations, capturing the underlying legal reasoning. Using this dataset, we systematically evaluate various prompting strategies, including zero-shot, few-shot, chain-of-thought, and tree-of-thoughts approaches, to generate both statute predictions and their corresponding legal rationales. Our evaluation framework measures not only predictive performance but also the coherence and legal validity of generated explanations, positioning PROSLEX as a benchmark for developing explainable AI systems that can support legal practitioners while advancing research in interpretable legal NLP. To ensure reproducibility, we have made our PROSLEX dataset and model code available on GitHub: https://github.com/subinay494/Legal Statute Prediction Explanation.
Sources
- MARRO: Multi-headed Attention for Rhetorical Role Labeling in Legal Documents
- Longformer: The Long-Document Transformer
- LEGAL-BERT: The Muppets straight out of Law School
- LexGLUE: A Benchmark Dataset for Legal Language Understanding in English
- Charge-Based Prison Term Prediction with Deep Gating Network
- IL-TUR: Benchmark for Indian Legal Text Understanding and Reasoning
- RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
- Learning to Predict Charges for Criminal Cases with Legal Basis
- BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generation
- An External Knowledge Enhanced Multi-label Charge Prediction Approach with Label Number Learning
- Distinguish Confusing Law Articles for Legal Judgment Prediction
- Legal Judgment Prediction via Multi-Perspective Bi-Feedback Network
- Legal Prompting: Teaching a Language Model to Think Like a Lawyer
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT
Related papers
- MAVEN-T: Reinforced Heterogeneous Distillation for Real-Time Multi-Agent Trajectory Prediction
- Model Discovery Agent: LLM-assisted Bayesian experiment design for data-efficient discovery of mechanistic world models
- Agents' Last Exam
- The Clinician's Veto: Navigating Trust, Liability, and Uncertainty in Autonomous AI Prescribing
- MindHelper: Closed-Loop Embodied Mental-State Reasoning for Precision Intervention
- Incumbent Advantage: Brand Bias and Cognitive Manipulation Dynamics in LLM Recommendation Systems