Fair on the Surface? Benchmarking Hidden-Output Fairness Gaps in LLM Recommenders
Chan Aristella Lu, Arya Fayyazi, Junhao Zhang, Saeid Shokoufa, Yue Xing, Zhen Xiang, Kyu Hyung Lee, Mehdi Kamal, Massoud Pedram
cs.AI
Submitted: 2026-08-08
Updated: 2026-08-11
License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Terminology
Sources
- WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedback
- Large Language Models for Generative Recommendation: A Survey and Visionary Discussions
- A Survey on Fairness in Large Language Models
- Fairness Definitions in Language Models Explained
- Auditing Language Model Unlearning via Information Decomposition
- Measuring Individual User Fairness with User Similarity and Effectiveness Disparity
- Is ChatGPT Fair for Recommendation? Evaluating Fairness in Large Language Model Recommendation
- Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Models
- Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparency
- ContextCite: Attributing Model Generation to Context
- AttnTrace: Contextual Attribution of Prompt Injection and Knowledge Corruption
- System Prompt Optimization with Meta-Learning
- Steering Language Models With Activation Engineering
Related papers
- MAVEN-T: Reinforced Heterogeneous Distillation for Real-Time Multi-Agent Trajectory Prediction
- Model Discovery Agent: LLM-assisted Bayesian experiment design for data-efficient discovery of mechanistic world models
- Agents' Last Exam
- The Clinician's Veto: Navigating Trust, Liability, and Uncertainty in Autonomous AI Prescribing
- MindHelper: Closed-Loop Embodied Mental-State Reasoning for Precision Intervention
- Incumbent Advantage: Brand Bias and Cognitive Manipulation Dynamics in LLM Recommendation Systems