A Fair Objective for Human-Empowerment-Preserving AI: Desiderata, Design, and Likely Behavioral Consequences
Jobst Heitzig, Ram Potham
cs.AI, cs.GT, cs.MA, econ.TH
Submitted: 2026-08-08
Updated: 2026-08-11
Comments: Slightly extended version of paper accepted for Algorithmic Decision Theory 2026
License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Terminology
Sources
- Superintelligent Agents Pose Catastrophic Risks: Can Scientist AI Offer a Safer Path?
- Safety from Honesty in a Disinterested AI Predictor
- A Survey of World Models for Autonomous Driving
- World Models
- Unbiased Canonical Set-Valued Oracles Via Lattice Theory
- Penalizing side effects using stepwise relative reachability
- A theory of appropriateness with applications to generative artificial intelligence
- Corrigibility as a Singular Target: A Vision for Inherently Reliable Foundation Models
- Is Sora a World Simulator? A Comprehensive Survey on General World Models and Beyond
Related papers
- MAVEN-T: Reinforced Heterogeneous Distillation for Real-Time Multi-Agent Trajectory Prediction
- Model Discovery Agent: LLM-assisted Bayesian experiment design for data-efficient discovery of mechanistic world models
- Agents' Last Exam
- The Clinician's Veto: Navigating Trust, Liability, and Uncertainty in Autonomous AI Prescribing
- MindHelper: Closed-Loop Embodied Mental-State Reasoning for Precision Intervention
- Incumbent Advantage: Brand Bias and Cognitive Manipulation Dynamics in LLM Recommendation Systems