Ask-E: An Environment for Calibrated Question Generation
Sarah Pratt, Jae Sung Park, Scott Geng, Ali Farhadi
cs.CL, cs.AI
Submitted: 2026-08-07
Updated: 2026-08-10
Code: https://github.com/sarahpratt/aske
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Today, we improve models by training and evaluating them on problems at the frontier of their abilities.
Terminology
Abstract
Today, we improve models by training and evaluating them on problems at the frontier of their abilities. Creating such problems is itself a demanding task, requiring the ability to probe model limits and generalize beyond existing question distributions. It also means placing problems at a precise difficulty level, which requires understanding what it takes to solve them. In short, generating problems calibrated to a model's current frontier demands capability beyond it, an increasingly burdensome constraint as models improve. Our key insight is that we can leverage this constraint to our advantage: a model that can generate problems consistently calibrated to a given frontier must possess capability beyond it. Accordingly, we present Ask-E, an environment that benchmarks and trains models on their ability to write questions at a given skill level, rather than answer them. Concretely, we define target skill levels as ranges bounded by the capabilities of two existing language models. A generated question is successfully calibrated if exactly one of the two models can solve it, placing it precisely within the target range and differentiating the capabilities of these models. Ask-E serves both as a benchmark and a training environment, where models generate problems calibrated to a variety of skill levels. We find that even frontier models achieve below 50% calibration on the benchmark, leaving significant headroom to measure future progress. We also show that training on this environment leads to improvements across a number of downstream math benchmarks even with no new math data, no interaction with stronger models, and no correctness-based reward.
Sources
- Phi-4-Mini Technical Report: Compact yet Powerful Multimodal Language Models via Mixture-of-LoRAs
- Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback
- MiniMax-M1: Scaling Test-Time Compute Efficiently with Lightning Attention
- Self-Questioning Language Models
- Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language Models
- U-MATH: A University-Level Benchmark for Evaluating Mathematical Skills in LLMs
- Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities
- Beyond Benchmarks: MathArena as an Evaluation Platform for Mathematics with LLMs
- When Judgment Becomes Noise: How Design Failures in LLM Judge Benchmarks Silently Undermine Validity
- Riemann-Bench: A Benchmark for Moonshot Mathematics
- The Delta Learning Hypothesis: Preference Tuning on Weak Data can Yield Strong Gains
- The Llama 3 Herd of Models
- DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning
- Curiosity-driven Red-teaming for Large Language Models
- R-Zero: Self-Evolving Reasoning LLM from Zero Data
- Language Self-Play For Data-Free Training
- QuestBench: Can LLMs ask the right question to acquire information in reasoning tasks?
- AutoBencher: Towards Declarative Benchmark Construction
- Ministral 3
- SPIRAL: Self-Play on Zero-Sum Games Incentivizes Reasoning via Multi-Agent Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learning
Related papers
- Exploring Solution Divergence and Its Effect on Large Language Model Problem Solving
- Ishigaki-IDS-Bench: A Benchmark for Generating Information Delivery Specification from BIM Information Requirements
- Subliminal Steering: Stronger Encoding of Hidden Signals
- MedStruct-S: A Benchmark for Key Discovery, Key-Conditioned QA and Semi-Structured Extraction from OCR Clinical Reports
- The End of Transformers? On Challenging Attention and the Rise of Sub-Quadratic Architectures
- Untangling the Mechanisms of Misleading Context in Medical Question Answering