An End-to-End Threat Model for the Quantum-as-a-Service Pipeline

arXiv:2608.05836 · cs.CR · Submitted 2026-08-06 · Read on arXiv

Badhon Rahman, Majid Haghparast, Tommi Mikkonen

cs.CR

Submitted: 2026-08-06

Comments: 2 pages, 1 Table. Accepted as a poster paper at the IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing & Engineering (QCE26)

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: Cloud-based accessing of Quantum-as-a-Service (QaaS) platforms such as IBM Quantum, IonQ Cloud, and Amazon Braket is becoming popular day by day.

Terminology

Abstract

Cloud-based accessing of Quantum-as-a-Service (QaaS) platforms such as IBM Quantum, IonQ Cloud, and Amazon Braket is becoming popular day by day. Hybrid quantum-classical algorithms (VQE, QAOA, QML) transfer data via a long layered pipeline of orchestration, compilation, and execution. Recent works have demonstrated various critical attacks at individual stages: Calibration tampering, SWAP attacks, QubitHammer, and so on. However, these attacks remain separated because of their own terminology, and existing STRIDE-based threat modeling in the context of quantum lacks a structured view towards the QaaS stack itself. We address this concern by decomposing the workflow into six-stage model with STRIDE threat modeling. Our matrix demonstrated attack vectors in quantum-specific, inherited classical, and plausible tiers for each of the stages. We further investigate the underexplored sections (repudiation and elevation-of-privilege) and distinguish three different cross-stage attack chains with higher impacts.

Sources

Related papers