Predicting Task Difficulty Without Rollouts
cs.LG, cs.CL
Submitted: 2026-08-06
Updated: 2026-10-15
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Task difficulty dictates an agent's likelihood of success, and estimating it without rollouts means forecasting this directly from a task description before executing costly simulations in stateful
Terminology
Abstract
Task difficulty dictates an agent's likelihood of success, and estimating it without rollouts means forecasting this directly from a task description before executing costly simulations in stateful environments. Reliable estimates would therefore allow environment designers to calibrate evaluation benchmarks and construct progressive training curricula. This becomes increasingly important as agents move into long-horizon domains, where empirical trial-and-error is a severe computational bottleneck. Prior work on early prediction is limited to static tasks or isolated coding environments, often relying on narrow features and inaccurate evaluation metrics. We study ex ante difficulty prediction across 17 agentic benchmarks spanning coding, mathematics, machine learning, web navigation, function calling, and other domains. We show that AUC can mask poor difficulty estimates, identify token-level entropy as a useful predictive signal, and show how residuals between expected and observed difficulty can expose hidden environment flaws such as contamination and infeasibility.
Sources
- How Do AI Agents Spend Your Money? Analyzing and Predicting Token Consumption in Agentic Coding Tasks
- Refining Minimax Regret for Unsupervised Environment Design
- The Stepwise Informativeness Assumption: Why are Entropy Dynamics and Reasoning Correlated in LLMs?
- SWE-Bench Pro: Can AI Agents Solve Long-Horizon Software Engineering Tasks?
- Agent psychometrics: Task-level performance prediction in agentic coding benchmarks
- The Llama 3 Herd of Models
- LLMs Gaming Verifiers: RLVR can Lead to Reward Hacking
- A Rosetta Stone for AI Benchmarks
- Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes
- BRIDGE: Predicting Human Task Completion Time From Model Performance
- Goldilocks RL: Tuning Task Difficulty to Escape Sparse Rewards for Reasoning
- Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks in Command Line Interfaces
- Olmo 3
- Gradient-Stable Attention Heads Signal LLM Correctness
- GDPval: Evaluating AI Model Performance on Real-World Economically Valuable Tasks
- Humanity's Last Exam
- Automatic Curriculum Learning For Deep RL: A Short Survey
- HCAST: Human-Calibrated Autonomy Software Tasks
- Soft Contamination Means Benchmarks Test Shallow Generalization
- Training Reinforcement Learning Agents and Humans With Difficulty-Conditioned Generators
Related papers
- Polynomial-Augmented Neural Networks (PANNs) with Weak Orthogonality Constraints for Enhanced Function and PDE Approximation
- AIRL-S: Unifying Reinforcement Learning and Search-Based Test-Time Scaling via Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning
- Transformers as Bayesian In-Context Experimenters: Smoothness-Adaptive Efficient ATE Estimation
- Convergence issues in Relational Concept Analysis based on AOC-posets
- Beliefs Beyond Posteriors: The Predictive Cost of ELBO Binding
- Understanding Diffusion Models via Ratio-Based Function Approximation with SignReLU Networks