How to Recognize New Words: A Comparison Between Context Biasing Methods and Speech LLMs

arXiv:2608.05759 · cs.CL · Submitted 2026-08-06 · Read on arXiv

Christian Huber, Alexander Waibel

cs.CL

Submitted: 2026-08-06

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: Recognizing new and rare words - named entities, acronyms, domain specific special words, and other items scarce in training data - remains a key challenge for automatic speech recognition (ASR).

Terminology

Abstract

Recognizing new and rare words - named entities, acronyms, domain specific special words, and other items scarce in training data - remains a key challenge for automatic speech recognition (ASR). We compare two strategies for this: context biasing methods, where an ASR model is extended such that during inference a word list can be supplied, and speech large language models (LLMs) prompted with context directly. We evaluate two context biasing methods based on Whisper against three speech LLMs across read and non-read speech, reporting biased, unbiased, and overall word error rate (WER). The context biasing methods cut biased WER by up to 88% relative while leaving other words largely unaffected. Speech LLMs excel on read speech but generalize less well to non-read speech, and prove sensitive to distractor count and prompt word order. We characterize the resulting trade-offs to guide method selection.

Sources

Related papers