Active-SWE: Benchmarking Coding Agents for Proactive Bug Fixing without Issue Reports
cs.SE, cs.AI
Submitted: 2026-08-05
Updated: 2026-09-29
Comments: 24 pages, 17 figures
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Coding agents powered by large language models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted in software engineering (SWE) scenarios, capable of fixing a specific bug in large-scale codebase.
Terminology
Abstract
Coding agents powered by large language models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted in software engineering (SWE) scenarios, capable of fixing a specific bug in large-scale codebase. However, existing SWE benchmarks typically assume that high-quality issue reports with detailed information are always available, which is easily violated in practice due to the complexity of report acquisition and curation. To address this, we introduce Active-SWE, a benchmark for evaluating coding agents on proactively discovering and fixing multiple bugs without report guidance, covering 1,663 tasks across six bug categories and eight languages. Beyond shifting the focus from existing reactive bug fixing to proactive bug fixing, Active-SWE enables a more in-depth evaluation by expanding the scope from fixing a specific recorded bug to multiple-bug fixing and potential bug discovery scenarios. To construct Active-SWE, we propose a novel difficulty-aware task formulation pipeline with a dual-track evaluation framework, facilitating comprehensive evaluation of proactive bug-fixing capability. Extensive experiments reveal that most state-of-the-art coding agents struggle with proactive bug-fixing tasks, demonstrating limited performance in locating and resolving recorded bugs, handling multiple bug fixing scenarios, and discovering valid potential bugs.
Sources
- The MiniMax-M2 Series: Mini Activations Unleashing Max Real-World Intelligence
- SWE-Bench Pro: Can AI Agents Solve Long-Horizon Software Engineering Tasks?
- AgentCoder: Multi-Agent-based Code Generation with Iterative Testing and Optimisation
- From LLMs to LLM-based Agents for Software Engineering: A Survey of Current, Challenges and Future
- Ling and Ring 2.6 Technical Report: Efficient and Instant Agentic Intelligence at Trillion-Parameter Scale
- TestExplora: Benchmarking LLMs for Proactive Bug Discovery via Repository-Level Test Generation
- SWE Atlas: Benchmarking Coding Agents Beyond Issue Resolution
- Seed2.0 Model Card: Towards Intelligence Frontier for Real-World Complexity
- OpenAI GPT-5 System Card
- Kimi K2.5: Visual Agentic Intelligence
- Live-SWE-agent: Can Software Engineering Agents Self-Evolve on the Fly?
- SWE-bench Multimodal: Do AI Systems Generalize to Visual Software Domains?
- ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models
- GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineering
- FeatureBench: Benchmarking Agentic Coding for Complex Feature Development
Related papers
- Falsification-Based Verification of LLM-Generated Optimization Models: Sound Test Batteries and Their Detection Limits
- GitSkills: A Dataset of Agent Skills on GitHub
- SABER: Benchmarking Operational Safety of LLM Coding Agents in Stateful Project Workspaces
- PackMonitor: Enabling Zero Package Hallucinations Through Decoding-Time Monitoring
- IntentCoding: Amplifying User Intent in Code Generation
- Incentives and Outcomes in Bug Bounties