EduClaw-Bench: A Long-Horizon Benchmark for Pedagogical LLM Agents with Simulated Learners
Unggi Lee, Sookbun Lee, Yeil Jeong, Eunjoo Lee, Minchul Shin, Hoilym Kwon
cs.CY, cs.AI, cs.CL
Submitted: 2026-08-04
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
The gist: Large language models (LLMs) power educational applications from tutoring to essay scoring, but each is a point solution to a single task, and only recently have these point solutions been integrated
Terminology
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) power educational applications from tutoring to essay scoring, but each is a point solution to a single task, and only recently have these point solutions been integrated into agents operating over a learning management system (LMS). Yet tutoring is long-horizon, since a learner improves over days and weeks rather than in a single turn, and no benchmark evaluates an agent tutor across a sustained relationship. We introduce EduClaw-Bench, a benchmark that places an agent tutor in a continuous 30-day relationship with a simulated learner grounded in knowledge tracing (KT), whose knowledge-concept mastery, from a KT model trained on real-student data, drives its answers and is probed for learning gain across 55 scenarios. Each agent is scored on three primary axes (learning gain, responsiveness, and helpfulness) and two curriculum-design axes (Gagn'e and Rosenshine), with helpfulness and the curriculum axes judged by a cross-family panel of three LLM judges. Evaluating 10 agent adapters over three base-model tiers yields two findings that single-tier, single-session evaluation cannot reach. First, tutoring quality belongs to the base model and the agent harness together rather than either alone. Second, almost no combination sustains good tutoring over the full horizon. A calibration check (ECE=0.049) and a live-classroom field study confirm that the simulated learner and its measurements track reality. Our work is a step toward trustworthy AI tutors for future education.
Sources
- Rank-Then-Score: Enhancing Large Language Models for Automated Essay Scoring
- Are Agents Ready to Teach? A Multi-Stage Benchmark for Real-World Teaching Workflows
- Simulating Students or Sycophantic Problem Solving? On Misconception Faithfulness of LLM Simulators
- ISD-Agent-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating LLM-based Instructional Design Agents
- Evaluating Gemini in an arena for learning
- Rewarding How Models Think Pedagogically: Integrating Pedagogical Reasoning and Thinking Rewards for LLMs in Education
- Automated Knowledge Concept Annotation and Question Representation Learning for Knowledge Tracing
- Tutor CoPilot: A Human-AI Approach for Scaling Real-Time Expertise
- DeepTutor: Towards Agentic Personalized Tutoring
- UniACE: A Unified Framework for Evaluating LLM Agentic Capabilities
Related papers
- Reasoning Enhances Robustness to Prompt Injection in LLM-Based Consensus
- Generative AI Purpose-built for Social and Mental Health: A Real-World Pilot
- PersonaMem-v3: Toward Omni-Platform Personal Intelligence for Holistic User Understanding, Recommendation, and Agentic Tasks
- What is an intelligent system?
- AI University: An LLM-Powered Learning Assistant for Engineering---A Finite Element Method Case Study
- Generative AI Use in Entrepreneurship: An Integrative Review and an Empowerment-Entrapment Framework