What Language Does and What the Evidence Supports: A Functional Role Taxonomy and Evidence Audit of Language Grounding in Embodied Agents

arXiv:2608.03099 · cs.CL · Submitted 2026-08-04 · Read on arXiv

Yifan Guo, Chenghao Li, Zhu Wang, Wei Xu, Yu Li, Yulong Zhu, Zhuo Sun, Bin Guo, Zhiwen Yu

cs.CL

Submitted: 2026-08-04

Comments: 19 pages, 3 figures, 11 tables

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: Foundation models place language throughout embodied agents, but its presence does not show what it contributes or how well that contribution is grounded.

Terminology

Abstract

Foundation models place language throughout embodied agents, but its presence does not show what it contributes or how well that contribution is grounded. This survey separates these two questions. We define five non-exclusive functional roles for language: Specification, Embodied Representation, Action Orchestration, Grounding Regulation, and Execution Coupling. For each role, we trace the path from linguistic content to its embodied consumer and identify the observations or interventions that can test the claimed responsibility. Applying this framework to the reviewed literature reveals a recurring gap between functional use and evidential support. Interpretable or revised linguistic intermediates may be incorrect, go unused, or fail to affect later behavior. Even when actions are directly conditioned on language, system-level success does not by itself isolate language's contribution. We therefore evaluate grounding claim by claim, asking whether the reported evidence supports the specific responsibility assigned to language. Using role claims rather than architectures as the unit of comparison allows us to compare modular and end-to-end embodied agents without extending conclusions beyond the reported evidence.

Sources

Related papers