ValueFormer: Stage-Aware Value Labels for Online Failure Detection and VLA Post-Training
cs.RO, cs.AI
Submitted: 2026-08-03
Updated: 2026-10-14
Comments: Accepted as a poster at the 8th Robot Learning Workshop (WRL) at NeurIPS 2026. 12 pages, 6 figures. Video: https://bit.ly/4i4kWTL
Code: https://github.com/huggingface/lerobot
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Generalist vision-language-action (VLA) policies now transfer to new scenes with little task-specific training, but they still fail silently: from the action stream alone, a collapsing rollout looks
Terminology
Abstract
Generalist vision-language-action (VLA) policies now transfer to new scenes with little task-specific training, but they still fail silently: from the action stream alone, a collapsing rollout looks much like one making clean progress, because imitation supplies no notion of progress. The cheap alternative, a terminal success / failure bit, is learnable in principle yet too sparse to say when a rollout went wrong. We argue that the per-frame label is the hard part, and that it works better when continuous and non-monotonic: a score rather than a single success or failure, and one free to fall and then rise again as a rollout goes wrong and recovers. Such a label is cheap to obtain: a person marks only the stage at which an episode went wrong, and the per-frame values are computed from that. We present ValueFormer, a policy-agnostic causal transformer (3.5M parameters) over a frozen DINOv3 backbone, emitting two per-frame signals in one forward pass: a smooth Monte Carlo value for advantage estimation and a sharp binary value for online mistake detection. Failed episodes carry a stage-aware, success-then-decay return. A teleoperation station already records an intervention flag; reusing it lifts held-out detection from 0.38 to 0.82 average precision and flags 95% of mistakes before the operator reacts. On a real bimanual sandwich station, feeding the critic back as a per-frame post-training weight raises task completion from 70% to 85% and removes a repeat-pick failure mode in our trials, although at n=20 that gain sits within noise.
Sources
- $\pi_0$: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control
- $\pi_{0.5}$: a Vision-Language-Action Model with Open-World Generalization
- $\pi^{*}_{0.6}$: a VLA That Learns From Experience
- OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Model
- RDT-1B: a Diffusion Foundation Model for Bimanual Manipulation
- GigaBrain-0.5M*: a VLA That Learns From World Model-Based Reinforcement Learning
- DINOv3
- RT-1: Robotics Transformer for Real-World Control at Scale
- RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control
- Xiaomi-Robotics-0: An Open-Sourced Vision-Language-Action Model with Real-Time Execution
- Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning
- Diffusion Policy Policy Optimization
- A Vision-Language-Action-Critic Model for Robotic Real-World Reinforcement Learning
- SAFE: Multitask Failure Detection for Vision-Language-Action Models
- AHA: A Vision-Language-Model for Detecting and Reasoning Over Failures in Robotic Manipulation
- I-FailSense: Towards General Robotic Failure Detection with Vision-Language Models
- Score the Steps, Not Just the Goal: VLM-Based Subgoal Evaluation for Robotic Manipulation
- RoboCLIP: One Demonstration is Enough to Learn Robot Policies
- Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordances
Related papers
- FMT x: An Efficient and Asymptotically Optimal Extension of the Fast Marching Tree for Dynamic Replanning
- MPCFormer: A physics-informed data-driven approach for explainable socially-aware autonomous driving
- RoboLab: A High-Fidelity Simulation Benchmark for Analysis of Task Generalist Policies
- ARC: A Reasoning Recipe for Robot Foundation Models
- HRDexDB: A 4D Dexterous Grasping Dataset Across Human and Multiple Robot Embodiments
- APT: Action Expert Pretraining Improves Instruction Generalization of Vision-Language-Action Policies