Cloud-ScPO: Hidden-State Geometry for Semi-Supervised Preference Optimization in LLM Reasoning
Yuzhou Liu, Xiyang Hu
cs.CL, cs.AI
Submitted: 2026-08-14
Updated: 2026-08-17
Comments: 14 pages, 2 figures, 7 tables. Preprint
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
The gist: Preference optimization improves mathematical reasoning in large language models (LLMs), but reliable chosen-rejected pairs usually require verified answers, human annotations, or external reward
Terminology
Abstract
Preference optimization improves mathematical reasoning in large language models (LLMs), but reliable chosen-rejected pairs usually require verified answers, human annotations, or external reward models. We investigate whether preference supervision can instead be derived from the model's internal representation geometry in a semi-supervised setting. Our analysis shows that reasoning trajectories generated across different mathematical problems form structured global point clouds in which correct and incorrect trajectories exhibit different geometric organization. Based on this observation, we propose Cloud--ScPO, a topology-guided preference-mining framework that uses a small labeled set to construct multiple correct and incorrect reference Clouds. Each trajectory is represented by a mean-pooled hidden state and scored against connectivity-induced components using a component-level soft k-nearest-neighbor measure averaged across reference banks. We combine this cross-problem Cloud signal with prompt-level self-consistency: self-consistency determines the answer-level preference direction, while Cloud scoring selects concrete trajectories and filters pairs by their score margin. Experiments on GSM8K and MATH-Numeric across four model settings show that Cloud--ScPO consistently improves over ScPO, with gains of up to 4.49% on GSM8K and 4.19% on MATH-Numeric. Pair-level analyses further show that Cloud--ScPO maintains comparable correctness reliability while more effectively separating informative chosen trajectories from incomplete, repetitive, or otherwise low-quality rejected responses.
Sources
- Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervision
- BERTops: Studying BERT Representations under a Topological Lens
- INSIDE: LLMs' Internal States Retain the Power of Hallucination Detection
- Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems
- The Llama 3 Herd of Models
- V-STaR: Training Verifiers for Self-Taught Reasoners
- Mistral 7B
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners
- The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasets
- Iterative Reasoning Preference Optimization
- Self-Consistency Preference Optimization
- DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models
- Interpretable Preferences via Multi-Objective Reward Modeling and Mixture-of-Experts
- Self-Training with Direct Preference Optimization Improves Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models
- Qwen3 Technical Report
- Silence the Judge: Reinforcement Learning with Self-Verifier via Latent Geometric Clustering
Related papers
- Exploring Solution Divergence and Its Effect on Large Language Model Problem Solving
- Ishigaki-IDS-Bench: A Benchmark for Generating Information Delivery Specification from BIM Information Requirements
- Subliminal Steering: Stronger Encoding of Hidden Signals
- MedStruct-S: A Benchmark for Key Discovery, Key-Conditioned QA and Semi-Structured Extraction from OCR Clinical Reports
- The End of Transformers? On Challenging Attention and the Rise of Sub-Quadratic Architectures
- Untangling the Mechanisms of Misleading Context in Medical Question Answering