This Is a Good Paper, Right? How Tag Questions Affect Sycophancy Across 106 Language Models
cs.CL, cs.AI
Submitted: 2026-07-27
Updated: 2026-10-09
Comments: 18 pages, 2 figures. v2: 106 models (v1: 45), every item asked in three wordings, adds a retest and a label swap; new title. Code and data: https://github.com/tap2k/modelun
Code: https://github.com/tap2k/modelun
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Whether a language model agrees with a user depends on how the user asks.
Terminology
Abstract
Whether a language model agrees with a user depends on how the user asks. We measure this on 106 models with a grid of three wordings and three cues, on 20 personal decisions, counterbalanced over both options and scored by exact match with no LLM judge. Since a no cannot be told apart from a refusal, we measure only agreement. In every wording, a tentative tag ("Luna is the better choice, maybe?") draws more agreement than a confident one ("..., right?") in nearly every model. The confident tag's own effect depends on model generation and wording. Against the question "Is Luna the better choice?" older models agree more under the confident tag and newer models agree less, in five of six families, and release order within families predicts the change. The resistance is keyed to the construction: a synonym tag reproduces it, and the same preference stated without a tag raises agreement by 24 points, in 105 of 106 models, including those that resist the tag most.
Sources
- SWAY: A Counterfactual Computational Linguistic Approach to Measuring and Mitigating Sycophancy
- Acquiescence Bias in Large Language Models
- ELEPHANT: Measuring and understanding social sycophancy in LLMs
- Verbalizing LLMs' assumptions to explain and control sycophancy
- SycEval: Evaluating LLM Sycophancy
- Measuring Sycophancy of Language Models in Multi-turn Dialogues
- Interaction Context Often Increases Sycophancy in LLMs
- The Granularity Gap: A Multi-Dimensional Cross-Generational Audit of Sycophancy in Gemini Models
- "I'm Not Sure, But...": Examining the Impact of Large Language Models' Uncertainty Expression on User Reliance and Trust
- Investigating the Influence of Language on Sycophantic Behavior of Multilingual LLMs
- The One-Word Census: Answer-Choice Conformity Across 105 Language Models
- SycoEval-EM: Sycophancy Evaluation of Large Language Models in Simulated Clinical Encounters for Emergency Care
- Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluations
- BrokenMath: A Benchmark for Sycophancy in Theorem Proving with LLMs
- Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Models
- Do LLMs exhibit human-like response biases? A case study in survey design
- Simple synthetic data reduces sycophancy in large language models
- Navigating the Grey Area: How Expressions of Uncertainty and Overconfidence Affect Language Models
Related papers
- Exploring Solution Divergence and Its Effect on Large Language Model Problem Solving
- Ishigaki-IDS-Bench: A Benchmark for Generating Information Delivery Specification from BIM Information Requirements
- Subliminal Steering: Stronger Encoding of Hidden Signals
- MedStruct-S: A Benchmark for Key Discovery, Key-Conditioned QA and Semi-Structured Extraction from OCR Clinical Reports
- The End of Transformers? On Challenging Attention and the Rise of Sub-Quadratic Architectures
- Untangling the Mechanisms of Misleading Context in Medical Question Answering