Uncertainty quantification in mechanics: A unified Bayesian perspective
Sascha Ranftl, Malte Rolf, Gerhard A. Holzapfel, Ellen Kuhl
physics.comp-ph, physics.data-an, stat.ME, stat.ML
Submitted: 2026-07-21
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is essential to experimental mechanics, but has become particularly relevant in computational mechanics, manifesting in two fundamental problem types: forward and
Terminology
Abstract
Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is essential to experimental mechanics, but has become particularly relevant in computational mechanics, manifesting in two fundamental problem types: forward and inverse problems. The former addresses how input uncertainties propagate to the quantities of interest, whereas the latter aims to infer unknown parameters from experimental observations or simulations. Since efficient propagation typically requires a prohibitive number of evaluations to compute marginal output distributions, the development of fast, data-driven surrogate models becomes necessary. Thus, we can distinguish between two inverse tasks: (i) the identification and calibration of input uncertainties, and (ii) the construction of surrogates, a methodology collectively referred to as surrogate-based UQ. Building on probabilistic reasoning and the concept of partial belief, we demonstrate that Bayesian probability theory provides a unified theoretical framework for addressing both problem types. We further show that Bayesian inference allows for the seamless incorporation of essential subproblems, including model selection for identifying the most probable model specifications and experimental design for optimizing data collection by identifying experiments or simulations that maximize expected information gain about parameters, among others such as connections to sensitivity analysis or the use of special priors like random fields. While this theoretical framework is presented for general mechanical problems, particular emphasis is placed on biomechanics, where variability and uncertainty is especially pronounced due to inherent biological heterogeneity, patient-specific variability, and noisy data.
Sources
- Unsupervised full-field Bayesian inference of orthotropic hyperelasticity from a single biaxial test: a myocardial case study
- FalconBC: Flow matching for Amortized inference of Latent-CONditioned physiologic Boundary Conditions
- PCE-PINNs: Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Uncertainty Propagation in Ocean Modeling
- Gaussian Processes for Big Data
- Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensembles
- An Expert's Guide to Training Physics-informed Neural Networks
- Multimodal Neural Operators for Real-Time Biomechanical Modelling of Traumatic Brain Injury
- Separable Operator Networks
- CatBoost: unbiased boosting with categorical features
- Scalable High-Dimensional Bayesian Field Reconstruction with Finite Elements: Application to 3D Porous Media Flow
- Bayesian optimal experimental design with Wasserstein information criteria
- Predictive Entropy Search for Efficient Global Optimization of Black-box Functions
- Max-value Entropy Search for Efficient Bayesian Optimization
- An Efficient Bayesian Framework for Inverse Problems via Optimization and Inversion: Surrogate Modeling, Parameter Inference, and Uncertainty Quantification
Related papers
- Refining Machine Learning Potentials through Thermodynamic Theory of Phase Transitions
- Polyconvex neural-network surrogates with learned paired directional features for anisotropic hyperelastic homogenization
- Learning Spectrally Optimised Mesh-Free Discretisations
- Feature-preserving Latent-EnKF for Data Assimilation of Flows with Shocks
- chemtrain-deploy: A parallel and scalable framework for machine learning potentials in million-atom MD simulations
- Omnisolver: An extensible interface to Ising spin-glass and QUBO solvers: adding a distributed GPU brute-force plugin