Retrieval-Augmented Interpretable Learning: Towards Task-Specific Zero-Shot Models in Healthcare

arXiv:2607.17508 · cs.LG, cs.AI · Submitted 2026-07-20 · Read on arXiv

cs.LG, cs.AI

Submitted: 2026-07-20

Updated: 2026-10-06

Comments: We note that a preliminary, non-archival workshop version of this work is available online under the name RAG-IM. RAIL is the renamed and completed version of the same work. This manuscript supersedes that earlier non-archival workshop version and should be consulted for the current formulation, results, and contributions

Code: https://github.com/abhinand5/MedEmbed

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

The gist: We introduce Retrieval-Augmented Interpretable Learning (RAIL), a probabilistic meta-learning framework for zero-shot generation of task-specific interpretable models that synthesizes

Terminology

Abstract

We introduce Retrieval-Augmented Interpretable Learning (RAIL), a probabilistic meta-learning framework for zero-shot generation of task-specific interpretable models that synthesizes coefficient-space structure from natural-language task descriptions and a memory of previously learned task-specific predictors. RAIL retrieves related source tasks, transfers structure through coefficient space, and generates a new predictor in the original diagnostic-feature space, enabling zero-shot and few-shot clinical procedure prediction with feature-level explanations. Its probabilistic formulation provides uncertainty over retrieval, model coefficients, and predictions, supporting uncertainty-aware deployment: uncertain predictions or unstable explanations can be flagged for additional clinical review rather than treated as automatic decisions. This makes RAIL particularly suited for healthcare settings, where prediction tasks are highly long-tailed, new clinical targets arise frequently, and models must remain inspectable, uncertainty-aware, and compatible with human oversight. Across long-tailed clinical procedure prediction tasks, RAIL improves low-data model generation, benefits from clinically informed task representations, and yields retrieval, uncertainty, and coefficient-level diagnostics that make model behavior more transparent. These results suggest a path toward scalable clinical prediction systems that can adapt to new tasks while preserving interpretability and reliability.

Sources

Related papers