Critic Experience Bank: Self-Evolving Step-Level Confidence Estimation for LLM Agents
cs.AI
Submitted: 2026-07-14
Updated: 2026-10-06
Comments: 20 pages, 5 figures
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: LLM agents operate in stateful environments, where a single erroneous step can waste limited interaction budget or cause irreversible effects before task failure becomes apparent.
Terminology
Abstract
LLM agents operate in stateful environments, where a single erroneous step can waste limited interaction budget or cause irreversible effects before task failure becomes apparent. Reliable deployment therefore requires step-level confidence estimation: estimating, before execution, the probability that a proposed action will advance the task. Existing LLM confidence estimators are typically designed for static question answering under a fixed task context and evaluation criterion. For an agent, however, its action productivity depends on an environment transition that is observed only after execution. To address this challenge, we introduce Critic Experience Bank (CEB), a training-free framework that turns feedback from completed trajectories into reusable evidence for future confidence judgments. After each trajectory, an LLM assigns hindsight productivity pseudo-labels to individual actions and stores them with the critic's original pre-execution confidence, task context, action, and observed feedback. For a new action, by retrieving related productive and unproductive experiences, CEB grounds pre-execution confidence in feedback from completed trajectories to condition a fixed LLM critic. CEB thereby adapts over a task stream without parameter updates or ground-truth step labels at deployment. Across four agent benchmarks spanning offline and live web navigation, mobile GUI and shell tasks, and three critic backbones, CEB achieves the best or tied-best ECE, Brier score, and AUC in all twelve benchmark-backbone settings under rule-based step labels, reducing ECE by up to 53.8% relative to the strongest training-free baseline. Its confidence scores also improve downstream utility in selective execution and simulated task success.
Sources
- Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback
- AMEX: Android Multi-annotation Expo Dataset for Mobile GUI Agents
- Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Know
- Calibrating LLM Confidence by Probing Perturbed Representation Stability
- Your Pre-trained LLM is Secretly an Unsupervised Confidence Calibrator
- Self-Evaluating LLMs for Multi-Step Tasks: Stepwise Confidence Estimation for Failure Detection
- Probabilities Are All You Need: A Probability-Only Approach to Uncertainty Estimation in Large Language Models
- WebCanvas: Benchmarking Web Agents in Online Environments
- The Art of Building Verifiers for Computer Use Agents
- E-valuator: Reliable Agent Verifiers with Sequential Hypothesis Testing
- MICE for CATs: Model-Internal Confidence Estimation for Calibrating Agents with Tools
- GENUINE: Graph Enhanced Multi-level Uncertainty Estimation for Large Language Models
- How Memory Management Impacts LLM Agents: An Empirical Study of Experience-Following Behavior
- Uncertainty in Action: Confidence Elicitation in Embodied Agents
- Guideline-Grounded Evidence Accumulation for High-Stakes Agent Verification
Related papers
- MAVEN-T: Reinforced Heterogeneous Distillation for Real-Time Multi-Agent Trajectory Prediction
- Model Discovery Agent: LLM-assisted Bayesian experiment design for data-efficient discovery of mechanistic world models
- Agents' Last Exam
- The Clinician's Veto: Navigating Trust, Liability, and Uncertainty in Autonomous AI Prescribing
- MindHelper: Closed-Loop Embodied Mental-State Reasoning for Precision Intervention
- Incumbent Advantage: Brand Bias and Cognitive Manipulation Dynamics in LLM Recommendation Systems