Beyond Cultural Persona Bias: Response Geometry as a Measure for Language Models and People

arXiv:2607.02368 · stat.ML, cs.AI, cs.LG, math.DG · Submitted 2026-07-02 · Read on arXiv

stat.ML, cs.AI, cs.LG, math.DG

Submitted: 2026-07-02

Updated: 2026-10-08

Project page: https://ipip.ori.org/new_ipip-50-item-scale.htm

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

The gist: Evaluations of LLM personas via psychometric questionnaires typically rely on aggregate scores, discarding within-instance correlation structure.

Terminology

Abstract

Evaluations of LLM personas via psychometric questionnaires typically rely on aggregate scores, discarding within-instance correlation structure. We test whether this geometric structure is intrinsic or frame-dependent. Constructing within-instance correlation matrices from IPIP-50 responses, we analyze geometry on SPD manifolds under manipulated question orderings in GPT-4o simulating American and Chinese-American personas. We find that persona expression comprises two dissociable components: aggregated features (Big Five scores) degrade under randomization (21% drop) but are frame-robust; geometric features (SPD manifold) collapse under frame misalignment (42% drop) but recover substantially (to 84%) under shared frames, surpassing aggregated features (76%). This collapse-recovery pattern reveals that persona geometry is not intrinsic but a frame-dependent coordination pattern encoding information invisible to aggregation. Our findings establish a dual-nature framework for LLM personas, frame-dependent geometry versus frame-robust aggregates, necessitating frame-aware evaluation and challenging static trait conceptions.

Sources

Related papers