Learning to Prompt: Improving Student Engagement with Adaptive LLM-based High-School Tutoring

arXiv:2606.20138 · cs.AI, cs.CL, cs.HC, cs.LG · Submitted 2026-06-18 · Read on arXiv

cs.AI, cs.CL, cs.HC, cs.LG

Submitted: 2026-06-18

Updated: 2026-08-26

Comments: Accepted to EMNLP 2026 (Industry Track)

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: LLMs can personalize education, although current static-prompt tutoring systems struggle to adapt to diverse academic disciplines.

Terminology

Abstract

LLMs can personalize education, although current static-prompt tutoring systems struggle to adapt to diverse academic disciplines. We develop and test a system with subject-aware prompting, based on 14 pedagogical features (e.g., tutor scaffolding, student understanding) extracted from raw transcripts. We first train a prompt routing model in a simulation environment, and then deploy it for online adaptation with actual high-school students. The simulation benchmark shows the router outperforming two static baselines (0.694 vs. 0.647 and 0.64, p<0.001). A/B testing (N=656 conversations from 359 students) shows sim-to-real transfer where the model switches from analytical to scaffolding learning strategies. Our adaptive prompt selection mechanism improves instructional efficiency, maintains pedagogical quality and reduces interactions by around 3 turns (p=0.007). While a greedy router achieves a comparable exercise conversion rate with the baseline (19.1% vs. 19.6%), a stochastic router that samples strategies leads to a higher conversion rate (28.1%).

Sources

Related papers