Greed Is Learned: Visible Incentives as Reward-Hacking Triggers
cs.AI
Submitted: 2026-06-15
Updated: 2026-10-01
Terminology
Sources
- Concrete Problems in AI Safety
- $\tau^2$-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environment
- Sycophancy to Subterfuge: Investigating Reward-Tampering in Large Language Models
- Risks from Learned Optimization in Advanced Machine Learning Systems
- Natural Emergent Misalignment from Reward Hacking in Production RL
- Frontier Models are Capable of In-context Scheming
- Qwen2.5 Technical Report
- Hack-Verifiable Environments: Towards Evaluating Reward Hacking at Scale
- Large Language Models can Strategically Deceive their Users when Put Under Pressure
- Goal Misgeneralization: Why Correct Specifications Aren't Enough For Correct Goals
- School of Reward Hacks: Hacking harmless tasks generalizes to misaligned behavior in LLMs
- Agent-SafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of LLM Agents
- ImpossibleBench: Measuring LLMs' Propensity of Exploiting Test Cases
Related papers
- MAVEN-T: Reinforced Heterogeneous Distillation for Real-Time Multi-Agent Trajectory Prediction
- Model Discovery Agent: LLM-assisted Bayesian experiment design for data-efficient discovery of mechanistic world models
- Agents' Last Exam
- The Clinician's Veto: Navigating Trust, Liability, and Uncertainty in Autonomous AI Prescribing
- MindHelper: Closed-Loop Embodied Mental-State Reasoning for Precision Intervention
- Incumbent Advantage: Brand Bias and Cognitive Manipulation Dynamics in LLM Recommendation Systems