Correlation-driven enhancement of pairing in a nematic Hund's metal

arXiv:2603.23314 · cond-mat.supr-con, cond-mat.str-el · Submitted 2026-03-24 · Read on arXiv

Listen

Radio episode about this paper

Transcript

Introduction to the show: ident: Quantum Radio. Generated commentary on the latest quantum physics and condensed matter papers.

Kai: I'm Kai.

Mira: And I'm Mira, here with Lev.

Kai: Today's paper: "Correlation-driven enhancement of pairing in a nematic Hund's metal".

Mira: The gist:

Kai: First, who's behind it and why it matters.

Paper summary: Kai: So, to recap what we just heard, this paper is looking at how correlation effects beyond simple quasiparticle descriptions are necessary to understand superconductivity when you mix nematicity and Hund coupling in a multiorbital metal.

Mira: The central claim is that Hund correlations play a dual role: they amplify the orbital differentiation of the pairing gaps while simultaneously inhibiting the extreme orbital polarization and coherence collapse that usually kills pairing at strong coupling.

Lev: That sounds like correlation physics is actively fighting against some known suppressive tendencies in this system, which is pretty interesting for error correction scenarios.

Kai: Right. They do a controlled cutoff analysis and find that the buildup of those gaps is orbital-dependent, showing that different parts of the correlated spectrum feed into pairing unevenly.

Mira: This means we can't just look at one energy scale to explain everything; you need to consider which frequency sectors are actually participating in Cooper pairing.

Lev: And they used a DMFT description combined with BCS treatment on a three-orbital model, specifically at filling four electrons per site, which reproduces the normal state of iron-based superconductors.

Kai: That setup reproduces the normal state phenomenology relevant to iron-based superconductors, and it lets them study superconductivity on top of that correlated background.

Mira: The paper addresses three guiding questions: does Hund assistance persist in the nematic state? How does nematicity reshape orbital differentiation across Hund regimes? And what is the role of the pairing cutoff as a spectral filter?

Lev: From an experimental standpoint, they’re essentially saying that you can’t rely solely on quasiparticle weights Zmu to explain everything once this frequency dependence sets in.

Kai: They are showing that even if one orbital becomes incoherent, like Zxy tending toward zero, the superconducting solution still has a finite gap.

Conclusion: Kai: So, looking at the title, "Correlation-driven enhancement of pairing in a nematic Hund's metal," it really highlights that the interplay between these two factors is what drives this unique superconducting behavior.

Mira: It points to the fact that you need dynamic correlation effects beyond just quasiparticles to see why superconductivity survives in this specific Hund regime.

Lev: So, if we boil it down for a listener, it’s about how the combination of nematicity and Hund coupling makes the pairing problem frequency selective and orbitally structured.

Kai: Exactly. It means that pairing mechanisms with different energy scales can lead to distinct gap structures even when you start with the same underlying correlated metal.

Mira: This suggests that if you tune parameters differently, or look at different frequency ranges in those systems, you might see very different superconducting outcomes despite sharing the same basic Hund-correlated normal state.

Lev: And for error correction research, it means we need to account for this spectral filtering when designing protocols because the effective pairing interaction isn't uniform across all frequencies.

Kai: That’s the real implication—the physics gets structured by both geometry and interaction strength in a very specific way.

Angelo Valli, *Laura Fanfarillo

Department of Theoretical Physics, Institute of Physics, Budapest University of Technology and Economics · HUN-REN-BME-BCE Quantum Technology Research Group · Istituto dei Sistemi Complessi (ISC-CNR)

cond-mat.supr-con, cond-mat.str-el

Submitted: 2026-03-24

Updated: 2026-10-14

Comments: Main text: 10 pages, 6 figures

License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/

Importance score: 89/100

The gist: The gist: Dynamical correlation effects beyond a quasiparticle-only description are essential to capture the robustness of superconductivity in the Hund regime Normal-state coherence in the

Key concepts

Hund's Correlation Regime
This regime occurs at large Hund's coupling (JH/U). In this state, the exchange interaction strongly supports metallic behavior across all orbitals, preventing the orbital-selective coherence collapse seen at lower coupling. It is key to maintaining metallicity and robust superconductivity even when quasiparticle weights are suppressed.
Orbital Differentiation
This refers to how different orbitals (like xz and yz) behave differently in terms of their spectral weight and superconducting gaps. Hund's correlations amplify this differentiation, meaning the pairing structure is not uniform across all orbitals, which is a key feature of the nematic state.
Dynamical Correlation Effects
These are complex electronic interactions that go beyond a simple quasiparticle picture. The paper shows these effects are essential for capturing superconductivity in the Hund regime because they reveal how different frequency windows of the correlated spectrum contribute unevenly to pairing, leading to non-trivial gap structures.
Cutoff Dependence ($\omega_0$)
The cutoff acts as a spectral filter. The way orbital gaps build up with this cutoff is nontrivial and depends on the orbital. This implies that which parts of the electronic spectrum participate in forming Cooper pairs—coherent or incoherent—is determined by this energy scale, leading to frequency-selective pairing.

Terminology

Summary

The gist: Dynamical correlation effects beyond a quasiparticle-only description are essential to capture the robustness of superconductivity in the Hund regime

Normal-state coherence in the tetragonal and nematic phase

The study begins by characterizing the correlated nematic normal state from which superconductivity emerges The evolution of normal-state orbital quasiparticle weights Zµ across the interaction range shows that at low JH/U, nematicity triggers a strongly orbital-selective coherence collapse, leading to an orbital-selective Mott (OSM) response At large JH/U, in contrast, Hund’s exchange strongly supports metallic behavior across orbitals: even in the presence of η > 0 the orbital-selective coherence collapse is strongly softened, and metallicity is retained in all orbitals, with a sizable orbital differentiation of the Zµ The corresponding occupations reveal that at low JH/U this nematic-driven charge reorganization is strongly amplified as U increases, driving two of the three orbitals toward (near) half filling while the other becomes correspondingly depleted or filled; this reorganization results in the OSM regime observed for the QP weights in Fig. 1(a)

Spectral evolution and orbital anisotropy in the nematic Hund’s metal

The spectral functions show that at low JH/U, panel (c), the nematic perturbation predominantly produces a relatively rigid differentiation of the xz/yz spectra around the Fermi level In contrast, in the Hund regime, panel (d), the nematic differentiation becomes strongly frequency dependent: the xz–yz imbalance evolves non-trivially with ω, with a frequency-modulated orbital redistribution of the nematic spectral weight This is already visible in the xz/yz line shapes and is emphasized by the spectral asymmetry ratio R∆(ω) In contrast to the low-JH/U case, panel (d), the nematic differentiation becomes strongly frequency dependent: the xz–yz imbalance evolves non-trivially with ω, with a frequency-modulated orbital redistribution of the nematic spectral weight

Superconductivity in the correlated nematic state

The robustness of the DMFT SC solution is not controlled by coherent quasiparticles Zµ In the Hund regime, the gaps remain finite and sizable even when the corresponding quasiparticle weights are strongly suppressed Specifically at large U and sizable η, the xy orbital can become essentially incoherent (Zxy → 0) while the SC solution still yields a finite ∆xy across the whole explored nematic range This phenomenology persists across the full nematic range η and directly extends to the nematic Hund metal beyond-Z robustness of the SC solution previously identified in the tetragonal case in [15]

Cutoff dependence: spectral filtering in the nematic Hund metal

The cutoff acts as a genuinely orbital-selective spectral filter, admitting distinct combinations of coherent and incoherent spectral contributions depending on its value In Fig. 5, the buildup with ω0 is nontrivial and orbital dependent: the finite-ω0 evolution need not follow a simple monotonic approach to the ω0 → ∞ plateaus, and the hierarchy at small cutoff can differ from the asymptotic hierarchy Diagnostics based on the nematic gap anisotropy R∆(ω0) and the spectral-window anisotropy RW (ω0) show that Hund correlations reorganize the energy distribution of the xz/yz imbalance for ω < ω0, yielding a reduced and strongly cutoff-dependent nematic gap anisotropy

Conclusions

Hund physics protects superconductivity in the nematic state by suppressing extreme nematic-driven charge polarization and coherence collapse at large U The pairing window matters, as varying the pairing cutoff ω0 provides a controlled probe of which frequency sectors of the dressed spectrum effectively enter the Cooper kernel This result provides a simple lens to interpret why different materials, or different tuning parameters within the same family, can exhibit distinct nematic gap structures despite sharing a similar Hund-correlated normal state

How it works

  1. Dynamical correlation effects beyond a quasiparticle-only description are essential to capture the robustness of superconductivity in the Hund regime.

  2. Hund correlations play a dual role in the nematic superconductor: they amplify the nematic orbital differentiation of pairing while preventing the extreme orbital-selective coherence collapse that would suppress superconductivity.

  3. The cutoff evolution of the orbital gaps is nontrivial and orbital-dependent in the nematic Hund regime, consistent with a pairing kernel sensitive to the frequency distribution of incoherent spectral weight rather than to coherent QPs alone.

  4. In the Hund regime, dynamical correlations not only enhance the orbital differentiation of the asymptotic gap values (ω0 → ∞) but also induce a non-monotonic buildup.

  5. The maximum of RW (ω0) occurs near the cutoff where R∆(ω0) changes sign, pointing to high-energy dynamical correlations as a key ingredient behind the inversion of the gap hierarchy.

The paper investigates how Hund-driven correlations reshape boson-mediated superconductivity in a multiorbital nematic metal by combining DMFT with BCS treatment It is important because it demonstrates that dynamical correlation effects beyond a quasiparticle-only description are essential to capture the robustness of superconductivity in the Hund regime. The findings reveal that Hund correlations play a dual role in the nematic superconductor: they amplify the nematic orbital differentiation of pairing while preventing the extreme orbital-selective coherence collapse that would otherwise suppress superconductivity. Furthermore, the analysis shows that pairing mechanisms with different characteristic boson energies can realize distinct gap structures and nematic responses even when acting on the same underlying Hund-correlated metal. The study concludes that nematicity and Hund correlations combine to make the pairing problem intrinsically frequency selective and orbitally structured.

How it works

The study combines a DMFT description of a correlated nematic three-orbital model with a mean-field BCS treatment The total Hamiltonian includes kinetic, nematic, and Hund terms. Local electronic interactions are included by considering the multiorbital Kanamori Hamiltonian which parametrizes the electron–electron interactions in terms of a Hubbard-like repulsion U and an exchange coupling JH. The pairing Hamiltonians are solved using a diagrammatic approach, where the BCS equations are coupled via the interorbital components of the particle-particle propagator. The analysis shows that while intraorbital pairing is assumed, both Gˆ−1 0 and its inverse Gˆ 0 are not block diagonal matrices due to the presence of finite interorbital hybridization term. These coupled equations are then dressed with DMFT self-energies obtained by the full frequency-dependent DMFT self-energies. The analysis shows that the QP treatment yields systematically smaller gaps than the full DMFT solution, and that this discrepancy becomes particularly pronounced at large JH, where the QP solution collapses to ∆µ = 0 already at intermediate U, while the DMFT solution remains finite. The results confirm that incoherent spectral weight is essential for pairing in the Hund regime.

Improvements for AI systems

  1. Bold spectral filtering analysis: The AI can perform a controlled cutoff analysis to reveal how different frequency windows of the correlated spectrum contribute unevenly to pairing in the nematic Hund regime, leading to distinct gap structures based on characteristic boson energies.

  2. Robustness assessment of superconductivity: The system can determine that dynamical correlation effects beyond a quasiparticle-only description are essential to capture the robustness of superconductivity in the Hund regime, confirming that pairing is sensitive to the redistribution of low-energy incoherent spectral weight encoded in the dynamical self-energies.

  3. Orbital differentiation mapping: The AI can map how nematicity reshapes orbital differentiation by identifying that "Hund correlations play a dual role in the nematic superconductor: they amplify nematic orbital differentiation of pairing while preventing the extreme orbital-selective coherence collapse that would suppress superconductivity."

  4. Cutoff-driven hierarchy inversion: The system can analyze the buildup with ω0 is nontrivial and orbital dependent, specifically noting that the order of the gaps at small cutoffs need not coincide with the ordering of the plateau values and identifying how this is driven by dynamical correlations, such as a crossing of the xz and yz gap curves.

  5. Correlation regime prediction: The AI can predict material behavior based on Hund's coupling strength, noting that At low JH/U, nematicity can strongly polarize the xz/yz sector and trigger an orbital-selective loss of coherence, while at large JH/U, it predicts that Hund exchange suppresses this extreme nematic-driven charge polarization and coherence collapse.

Related papers