Multifidelity-Augmented Gaussian Process Inputs for Surrogate Modeling from Scarce Data
stat.ML, cs.LG
Submitted: 2026-03-23
Updated: 2026-06-24
Journal ref: Computer Methods for Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Volume 461, Part B, 1 November 2026
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2026.119229
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: Supervised machine learning describes the practice of fitting a parameterized model to labeled input-output data.
Terminology
Abstract
Supervised machine learning describes the practice of fitting a parameterized model to labeled input-output data. Supervised machine learning methods have demonstrated promise in learning efficient surrogate models that can (partially) replace expensive high-fidelity models, making many-query analyses, such as optimization, uncertainty quantification, and inference, tractable. However, when training data must be obtained through the evaluation of an expensive model or experiment, the amount of training data that can be obtained is often limited, which can make learned surrogate models unreliable. In many engineering and scientific settings, cheaper low-fidelity models may be available, for example arising from simplified physics modeling or coarse grids. These models may be used to generate additional low-fidelity training data. The goal of multifidelity machine learning is to use both high- and low-fidelity training data to learn a surrogate model which is cheaper to evaluate than the high-fidelity model, but more accurate than any available low-fidelity model. This work proposes a new multifidelity training approach for Gaussian process regression which uses low-fidelity data to define additional features that augment the input space of the learned model. Similarly to cokriging estimators, the proposed approach conditions the high-fidelity surrogate model on the predictions of all available low-fidelity surrogate models, while benefiting from the computational efficiency of autoregressive estimators. Numerical experiments on several test problems demonstrate both increased predictive accuracy and reduced computational cost relative to the state of the art.
Sources
- Review of multi-fidelity models
- Multifidelity domain decomposition-based physics-informed neural networks and operators for time-dependent problems
- Grouped approximate control variate estimators
- A transport-based multifidelity preconditioner for Markov chain Monte Carlo
- Multi-fidelity Learning of Reduced Order Models for Parabolic PDE Constrained Optimization
- Multi-Fidelity Methods for Optimization: A Survey
- Standard Gaussian Process is All You Need for High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimization
- Deep Kernel Learning
- Non-Gaussian Process Regression
- Machine Learning of Linear Differential Equations using Gaussian Processes
- Physics-Informed Gaussian Process Regression Generalizes Linear PDE Solvers
- Deep Multi-fidelity Gaussian Processes
- Physics-Informed CoKriging: A Gaussian-Process-Regression-Based Multifidelity Method for Data-Model Convergence
- Neural ensemble Kalman filter: Data assimilation for compressible flows with shocks
Related papers
- Behavior of prediction performance metrics with rare events
- Optimal Estimation of Generic Dynamics by Path-Dependent Neural Jump ODEs
- A Posterior-Dynamics Framework for Imaging Inverse Problems with Pretrained Diffusion Priors
- Efficient quadratic entropy with distance sketches
- Embedding-Bias in Conditional Independence Testing
- From Log-Odds to Shapley Values: An Explanatory Geometry for the Weighted Naive Bayes Classifier