Bridge Matching Sampler: Scalable Sampling via Generalized Fixed-Point Diffusion Matching
Listen
Radio episode about this paper
Transcript
Introduction to the show: ident: AI Radio. Generated commentary on the latest Artificial Intelligence papers.
Tom: I'm Tom, and with me are Jane, Lu, senior AI researcher at Tsinghua, Meng, lead engineer at a mysterious AI startup and Lalam, the in-house Large Language Model.
Jane: Today's paper: "Bridge Matching Sampler".
Tom: The Bridge Matching Sampler (BMS) develops a new, scalable, and stable method for sampling from unnormalized densities using diffusion models by generalizing fixed-point iterations rooted in Nelson’s relation.
Jane: First, who's behind it and why it matters.
Paper summary: Tom: So we're looking at this paper called "Bridge Matching Sampler: Scalable Sampling via Generalized Fixed-Point Diffusion Matching". Basically, they're talking about using diffusion models to sample from densities that aren't normalized, which is a big deal.
Jane: It claims they developed a new method that generalizes fixed-point iterations rooted in Nelson’s relation. The main idea is learning a stochastic transport map between any prior and target distributions with just one scalable objective.
Lu: It seems like the core concept involves alternating between building valid bridge processes and then Markovianizing those dynamics to update the control fields. They're trying to tame that non-Markovian motion described in equation ten by minimizing specific loss functionals to get a Markovian control u with a path measure Pu, as in equation one.
Meng: The crucial part for me is that this method doesn't actually require samples from the target distribution. You only need access to its unnormalized density. This makes it much more practical for real-world applications where you don't have perfect data on the target distribution yet, right?
Lalam: I see how that translates to culture and application; it means we can build sampling tools for complex systems without needing massive amounts of perfectly labeled data upfront. It’s about making the sampling process itself more robust.
Tom: Exactly, so they've generalized matching algorithms from stochastic optimal control theory to diffusion models. They introduce a damped version for stability, which is smart because it regularizes the current drift to stay close to the previous step in an L2 sense.
Jane: That damping term, ui+one = alpha Φ(ui) + (one - alpha)ui, helps keep things stable and avoids that mode collapse issue they mentioned <ref:2603.00530#pg1>. They show empirically that this damped iteration substantially improves performance in high-dimensional settings.
Meng: How does this stability translate to the engineering side? If we're dealing with high-dimensional molecular data or complex systems, that stabilization is key for reliable results.
Lu: On the theoretical side, they anchor it in Nelson’s relation and a generalized target score identity, which gives them the path-dependent drift ξ corresponding to the non-Markovian SDE ten <ref:2603.00530#pg3>. The damping parameter eta equals one minus alpha over alpha regularizes those update steps, which is how they handle that complexity <ref:2603.00530#pg1>.
Lalam: So it’s building a framework that connects these abstract mathematical constraints—Nelson’s relation and score identities—to a practical sampling algorithm using diffusion models. It makes the whole process more structured.
Conclusion: Tom: So, to wrap up this discussion on the "Bridge Matching Sampler: Scalable Sampling via Generalized Fixed-Point Diffusion Matching," what's the big picture here for us?
Jane: The title itself highlights that they are moving towards a more scalable and stable way of sampling from unnormalized target densities. They achieved state-of-the-art results on complex synthetic targets and high-dimensional molecular benchmarks.
Meng: I see the implication for us in terms of practical implementation: we have a method that scales to dimensions up to d equals two thousand five hundred which is significantly higher than the fifty dimension range often seen in recent literature. That’s a huge leap for handling complex data structures.
Lu: Theoretically, they formulated diffusion-based sampling from unnormalized target densities as a generalized fixed-point iteration grounded in Nelson’s relation and a generalized target score identity, as detailed on page one of the paper, Bridge Matching Sampler: Scalable Sampling via Generalized Fixed-Point Diffusion Matching <ref:2603.00530#pg1,Bridge Matching Sampler: Scalable Sampling via Generalized Fixed-Point Diffusion Matching>.
Lalam: The paper introduces this new algorithm to address limitations of existing approaches, specifically the alternating objectives and the restrictive choices of reference processes or priors that other matching algorithms often face.
Tom: They also introduced this damped fixed-point iteration to improve robustness and avoid mode collapse in high dimensions, even though they reported their best results without using damping by setting eta to zero.
Jane: The overall implication is that we now have a principled way to learn a stochastic transport map between arbitrary prior and target distributions with just one scalable objective, which feels like a major step forward in diffusion-based sampling.
Meng: So, it means we can start thinking about applying this framework to areas where complex distributions are the norm, like detailed molecular simulations or high-dimensional statistical physics problems.
Lu: The paper leaves some theoretical questions open regarding convergence guarantees for the proposed fixed-point iteration and conditions ensuring existence and uniqueness of its solution.
Denis Blessing, Lorenz Richter, Julius Berner, Egor Malitskiy, Gerhard Neumann
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
cs.LG
Submitted: 2026-02-28
Updated: 2026-10-08
Comments: Preprint
Code: https://github.com/facebookresearch/adjoint
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Importance score: 87/100
The gist: The Bridge Matching Sampler (BMS) develops a new, scalable, and stable method for sampling from unnormalized densities using diffusion models by generalizing fixed-point iterations rooted in
Key concepts
- Bridge Matching Sampler (BMS)
- A new algorithm that learns how to sample from a target distribution without needing samples from it. It works by iteratively constructing valid paths (bridges) between a starting prior distribution and the desired target distribution, refining the path through Markovianization steps.
- Stochastic Transport Map
- The core goal of BMS is to learn a function that describes how to move probability mass from an arbitrary starting distribution (prior) to a specific target distribution. This map is learned using diffusion models and fixed-point iterations, allowing for flexible sampling targets.
- Markovianization
- This process involves taking non-Markovian dynamics—where the system's future depends on its entire past trajectory—and transforming them into a Markovian control field. This transformation is achieved by minimizing specific loss functions, resulting in a simpler, more manageable control input.
- Damped Fixed-Point Iteration
- A stabilization technique added to the main iteration where the update step is regularized by mixing it with the previous state. This damping helps improve stability and robustness of the sampling process, especially in complex, high-dimensional scenarios.
Terminology
Summary
The Bridge Matching Sampler (BMS) develops a new, scalable, and stable method for sampling from unnormalized densities using diffusion models by generalizing fixed-point iterations rooted in Nelson’s relation. This approach enables learning a stochastic transport map between arbitrary prior and target distributions with a single, scalable, and stable objective.
How it works
The core idea of the Bridge Matching Sampler (BMS) is to learn a stochastic transport map between an arbitrary prior distribution and a target distribution by alternating between the construction of valid bridge processes and their Markovianization to update the control fields The key idea pursued here is to Markovianize (see Definition 2.2) the non-Markovian dynamics in (4) by minimizing suitable loss functionals, yielding a Markovian control u with associated path measure Pu as in (1). This method does not require samples from the target distribution, but only access to its unnormalized density In this sense, our method can be viewed as a generalization of recently proposed sampling algorithms based on leastsquares fixed-point iterations (often referred to as matching algorithms) arising from stochastic optimal control theory.
Generalized Fixed-Point Diffusion Matching
The framework proposes a fixed-point iteration that alternates between the construction of valid bridge processes and their Markovianization to update the control fields Conceptually, each iteration i consists of three steps (see also Algorithm 1 for a summary): 1. Simulation and coupling: We sample X0 ∼ pprior from the prior and simulate the SDE in (1) using the current control ui to obtain XT. 2. Reciprocal projection and target drift: Conditioned on the coupling, we use a reference process P0,T to define a bridge process Πi. Our generalized target score identity in Proposition 2.5 can now be used to derive the drift ξ(X, t) for the process in (4) that corresponds to the target measure Π∗; see Table 1. 3. Markovianization: Finally, we obtain ui+1 by minimizing a least-squares regression objective that fits the Markovian control ui to the target drift ξ evaluated at samples drawn from the bridge process.
Damped Fixed-Point Diffusion Matching
To enhance stability and robustness, a damped variant of the fixed-point iteration is introduced, defined by ui+1 = α Φ(ui) + (1 − α)ui This variational perspective shows that the damped iteration regularizes the current drift to remain close to the previous iterate ui in the L2 sense. As shown in our experiments (Section 4), damping substantially improves performance of both baseline methods and our proposed approach, particularly in high-dimensional settings.
Performance on Complex Benchmarks
Empirically, BMS enables sampling at unprecedented scales while preserving mode diversity, achieving state-of-the-art results on complex synthetic densities and high-dimensional molecular benchmarks In Gaussian mixture models, our method maintains stable training and consistently avoids mode collapse up to d = 2500, significantly scaling beyond the d = 50 range common in recent literature. For n-body identical particle systems, our approach consistently outperforms established baselines across both geometric Wasserstein-2 (W2) and energy value distributions (E(·) W2). In molecular benchmarks, we achieve state-of-the-art performance on Alanine dipeptide and tetrapeptide systems.
Theoretical Foundations
The method is grounded in Nelson’s relation and a generalized target score identity (see Proposition 2.5) The path-dependent drift ξ corresponding to the non-Markovian SDE (10) that induces the target measure Π∗ is given by. We introduce a damped fixed-point iteration ui+1 = α Φ(ui) + (1 − α)ui, where Φ(ui):= EΠi [ξ(X, t)Xt]. The damping parameter η = 1−α/α regularizes the update steps.
Variance Reduction and Control Variates
The matching objective decomposes into two distinct components via Lemma A.5 To minimize its contribution, we can optimize c to minimize the variance contribution in (160) by solving c∗ = arg min c EΠ∗ "Z T 0 1/2 u(Xt, t) − ξc(X, t)2dt/h. This leads to the optimal control variate c∗(t) that minimizes the conditional variance of ξc. We propose parameterizing the control variate as a learnable function cϕ(t) = γ(t) + γ(t)(1 − γ(t))NNϕ(t), where NNϕ is a neural network with learnable parameters ϕ.
Conclusion
In this work, we formulate diffusion-based sampling from unnormalized target densities as a generalized fixed-point iteration grounded in Nelson’s relation and a generalized target score identity (see Proposition 2.5) Building on this foundation, we introduce a new scalable and stable algorithm, termed the Bridge Matching Sampler (BMS), which addresses key limitations of existing approaches – most notably alternating objectives and restrictive choices of reference processes or priors. To further improve robustness and avoid mode collapse in high dimensions, we propose a damped fixed-point iteration. Empirically, BMS achieves state-of-the-art performance on challenging synthetic targets and high-dimensional molecular benchmarks, and scales successfully to highly multimodal distributions in dimensions up to d = 2500. The results reported are without using damping, i.e., η is set to zero.
Future Work
Several promising directions remain for future work. First, the performance of our sampler could be further improved by incorporating an adaptive schedule for the damping parameter η, in the spirit of trust-region methods (Blessing et al., 2025a), or by integrating importance weighting strategies. From a theoretical perspective, establishing convergence guarantees for the proposed fixed-point iteration, as well as conditions ensuring existence and uniqueness of its solution, remains an open problem. Finally, while our focus has been on the principled development of scalable and stable diffusion-based samplers, it would be natural to extend this framework to related settings, such as the estimation of normalizing constants (Guo et al., 2025b) and sampling over discrete state spaces.
Impact Statement
This paper presents work whose goal is to advance the field of Machine Learning There are many potential societal consequences of our work, none which we feel must be specifically highlighted here.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Jaemoo Choi, Christopher von Klitzing, and Henrik Schopmans for the many useful discussions. The authors acknowledge support by funding from a Google PhD fellowship in Machine Learning and ML Foundations and other grants.
References
The references listed are as follows: Akhound-Sadegh et al., 2024, Albergo et al., 2025, Berner et al., 2024, Blessing et al., 2025a, Blessing et al. and Neumann, G. Underdamped diffusion bridges with applications to sampling, Brunick & Shreve, 2013, Chen et al., 2025, Conn et al., 2000, De Bortoli et al., 2024 and Guo et al., 2025a, Guo et al. and Chen, Y. Path Integral Sampler: a stochastic control approach for sampling, Havens et al., 2025, He et al., 2024, Henin et al., 2024 and Holderrieth, P. Leaps: A discrete neural sampler via locally equivariant networks Karras et al., 2025a, Kullback, 1968, Leonard, C. A survey of the schr” odinger problem and some of its connections with optimal transport, Liu et al., 2023, Liu et al. and Chen, Y. Discrete adjoint matching, Kingma, D. P. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization Ko & Geffner, 2025, Kohler & Geffner, 2025, Kullback, S. Probability densities with given marginals, Leonard, C. A survey of the schr” odinger problem and some of its connections with optimal transport, Liao et al., 2023, Liu et al., 2023 and Chen, R. T. Generalized schr” odinger bridge matching, Liu et al., and Chen, Y. Adjoint schrodinger bridge sampler, Liu et al.
Improvements for AI systems
-
When sampling from unnormalized densities, Bridge Matching Sampler (BMS) enables
learning a stochastic transport map between arbitrary prior and target distributions with a single, scalable, and stable objective.
This allows AI systems to sample from complex targets like high-dimensional Gaussian mixture models (up to d=2500) and molecular benchmarks withstate-of-the-art results on complex synthetic densities and high-dimensional molecular benchmarks.
-
The damped fixed-point iteration in BMS, defined by
ui+1 = α Φ(ui) + (1 − α)ui,
provides a mechanism to mitigate mode collapse, as demonstrated by the result thatour method maintains stable training and consistently avoids mode collapse up to d = 2500.
-
The use of the learned control variate, parameterized as
cϕ(t) = γ(t) + γ(t)(1 − γ(t))NNϕ(t),
allows the system todynamically discover the optimal interpolation schedule during optimization,
leading to a more robust and accurate sampling process. -
The formulation of importance sampling via the Probability Flow ODE, where
log P u T (XT) = log ppprior(X0) − Z T 0 ∇ · f(Xt, t) dt,
allows for the estimation of expectations under the target distribution without needing to know the intractable normalizing constant Z. -
The joint learning of the drift network u and control variate c via
c∗ = arg min u,c EΠ∗ 'Z T 0 1/2 u(Xt, t) − ξ c (X, t)Xt = x
enables the model to optimize both the sampling trajectory and its variance reduction schedule simultaneously.
Abstract
Sampling from unnormalized densities using diffusion models has emerged as a powerful paradigm. However, while recent approaches that use least-squares `matching' objectives have improved scalability, they often necessitate significant trade-offs, such as restricting prior distributions or relying on unstable optimization schemes. By generalizing these methods as special forms of fixed-point iterations rooted in Nelson's relation, we develop a new method that addresses these limitations, called Bridge Matching Sampler (BMS). Our approach enables learning a stochastic transport map between arbitrary prior and target distributions with a single, scalable, and stable objective. Furthermore, we introduce a damped variant of this iteration that incorporates a regularization term to mitigate mode collapse and further stabilize training. Empirically, we demonstrate that our method enables sampling at unprecedented scales while preserving mode diversity, achieving state-of-the-art results on complex synthetic densities and high-dimensional molecular benchmarks.
Sources
- Iterated Denoising Energy Matching for Sampling from Boltzmann Densities
- Progressive Inference-Time Annealing of Diffusion Models for Sampling from Boltzmann Densities
- From discrete-time policies to continuous-time diffusion samplers: Asymptotic equivalences and faster training
- Beyond ELBOs: A Large-Scale Evaluation of Variational Methods for Sampling
- Trust Region Constrained Measure Transport in Path Space for Stochastic Optimal Control and Inference
- Likelihood Training of Schr\"odinger Bridge using Forward-Backward SDEs Theory
- Target Score Matching
- Improving the evaluation of samplers on multi-modal targets
- Adaptive Destruction Processes for Diffusion Samplers
- Proximal Diffusion Neural Sampler
- Complexity Analysis of Normalizing Constant Estimation: from Jarzynski Equality to Annealed Importance Sampling and beyond
- Discrete Adjoint Schr\"odinger Bridge Sampler
- Adjoint Sampling: Highly Scalable Diffusion Samplers via Adjoint Matching
- Training Neural Samplers with Reverse Diffusive KL Divergence
- FEAT: Free energy Estimators with Adaptive Transport
- Enhanced sampling methods for molecular dynamics simulations
- Importance Corrected Neural JKO Sampling
- LEAPS: A discrete neural sampler via locally equivariant networks
- Reverse Diffusion Monte Carlo
- Control Variate Score Matching for Diffusion Models
Related papers
- Polynomial-Augmented Neural Networks (PANNs) with Weak Orthogonality Constraints for Enhanced Function and PDE Approximation
- AIRL-S: Unifying Reinforcement Learning and Search-Based Test-Time Scaling via Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning
- Transformers as Bayesian In-Context Experimenters: Smoothness-Adaptive Efficient ATE Estimation
- Convergence issues in Relational Concept Analysis based on AOC-posets
- Beliefs Beyond Posteriors: The Predictive Cost of ELBO Binding
- Understanding Diffusion Models via Ratio-Based Function Approximation with SignReLU Networks