From Leaky Thoughts to Private Reasoning: Controlling What LRMs Say to Themselves
cs.CL, cs.AI
Submitted: 2026-02-27
Updated: 2026-08-28
Comments: Accepted at EMNLP 2026 (main)
Code: https://github.com/UKPLab/arxiv2026-controllable-reasoning-models
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
The gist: Large reasoning models (LRMs) produce reasoning traces (RTs) that often contain sensitive information.
Terminology
Abstract
Large reasoning models (LRMs) produce reasoning traces (RTs) that often contain sensitive information. These leaky thoughts are difficult to control and frequently violate explicit privacy directives. Because RTs can be exposed through prompt injection attacks, this becomes a direct privacy risk to the user. We approach this as a controllability problem: since privacy directives are themselves instructions, improving instruction-following (IF) within the RT provides a direct path to reducing privacy leaks. To this end, we introduce an SFT dataset that teaches models to follow general instructions throughout their reasoning process, and propose Staged Decoding, a simple decoding strategy that decouples RT and answer generation using separate LoRA adapters to maximize IF of each component. We evaluate our approach on six models from two families (1.7B-14B parameters), across two IF benchmarks and two privacy benchmarks. Our method yields substantial improvements, with gains of up to 20.9 points in IF and 51.9 percentage points on privacy benchmarks, though these can come at the cost of task utility due to the trade-off between reasoning performance and IF. Our results show that improving IF in LRMs can significantly enhance privacy, suggesting a promising direction for future privacy-aware LRMs. Our code is available at https://github.com/UKPLab/arxiv2026-controllable-reasoning-models.
Sources
- Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems
- Chain-of-Sanitized-Thoughts: Plugging PII Leakage in CoT of Large Reasoning Models
- Scaling Reasoning, Losing Control: Evaluating Instruction Following in Large Reasoning Models
- Phi-4 Technical Report
- Monitoring Reasoning Models for Misbehavior and the Risks of Promoting Obfuscation
- From "Aha Moments" to Controllable Thinking: Toward Meta-Cognitive Reasoning in Large Reasoning Models via Decoupled Reasoning and Control
- ReasonIF: Large Reasoning Models Fail to Follow Instructions During Reasoning
- Efficient Multi-Adapter LLM Serving via Cross-Model KV-Cache Reuse with Activated LoRA
- Chain of Thought Monitorability: A New and Fragile Opportunity for AI Safety
- CIMemories: A Compositional Benchmark for Contextual Integrity of Persistent Memory in LLMs
- gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Card
- Effectively Controlling Reasoning Models through Thinking Intervention
- Qwen3 Technical Report
- Dynamic Early Exit in Reasoning Models
- Controlling What You Share: Assessing Language Model Adherence to Privacy Preferences
- Trade-offs in Large Reasoning Models: An Empirical Analysis of Deliberative and Adaptive Reasoning over Foundational Capabilities
- Evaluating Language Model Reasoning about Confidential Information
- Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Models
Related papers
- Exploring Solution Divergence and Its Effect on Large Language Model Problem Solving
- Ishigaki-IDS-Bench: A Benchmark for Generating Information Delivery Specification from BIM Information Requirements
- Subliminal Steering: Stronger Encoding of Hidden Signals
- MedStruct-S: A Benchmark for Key Discovery, Key-Conditioned QA and Semi-Structured Extraction from OCR Clinical Reports
- The End of Transformers? On Challenging Attention and the Rise of Sub-Quadratic Architectures
- Untangling the Mechanisms of Misleading Context in Medical Question Answering