GUI-GenBench: Evaluating Image Generation Models as Interactive GUI Environments

arXiv:2602.09007 · cs.AI, cs.CV · Submitted 2026-02-09 · Read on arXiv

cs.AI, cs.CV

Submitted: 2026-02-09

Updated: 2026-09-26

Comments: 24 pages, 11 figures. Project page: https://github.com/stepfun-ai/GEBench

Code: https://github.com/stepfun-ai/GEBench

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: An image generation model used as a graphical user interface (GUI) environment must produce not only a plausible screen but also the correct response to an action.

Terminology

Abstract

An image generation model used as a graphical user interface (GUI) environment must produce not only a plausible screen but also the correct response to an action. Existing visual-generation benchmarks do not directly assess this combination of functional correctness and temporal consistency in GUIs. We introduce GUI-GenBench, a benchmark of 700 curated samples across five task suites: single-step transitions, multi-step planning, fictional-app generation, real-app trajectories, and coordinate-based grounding. We also introduce GUI-Score, a VLM-based metric that assesses Goal Achievement, Interaction Logic, Content Consistency, UI Plausibility, and Visual Quality. Evaluating 12 image generation models on Chinese and English subsets, we find that strong single-step performance does not consistently extend to coherent multi-step trajectories or accurate grounding. The highest aggregate GUI-Scores are 69.62 on the Chinese subset and 63.16 on the English subset. Qualitative analysis further identifies failures in text rendering, icon interpretation, and coordinate-conditioned transitions. Together, these results distinguish visual plausibility from functional reliability and identify limitations that must be addressed before generated GUIs can serve as dependable interaction environments.

Sources

Related papers