Stochastic Decision Horizons for Survival-Based Constrained Reinforcement Learning
cs.LG
Submitted: 2026-02-04
Updated: 2026-09-29
Code: https://github.com/tgeijten/sconegym
Project page: https://tinyurl.com/sdh-crl
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The gist: We propose stochastic decision horizons (SDH), a theoretically grounded framework for survival-based constrained reinforcement learning from per-step violation signals.
Terminology
Abstract
We propose stochastic decision horizons (SDH), a theoretically grounded framework for survival-based constrained reinforcement learning from per-step violation signals. Rather than treating violations as expenditure of a cumulative budget, SDH shortens the effective decision horizon when violations occur, reducing current reward credit and future bootstrapping. We show that this construction represents a geometric-horizon survival constraint and, for a fixed Lagrange multiplier, remains the same SDH problem up to a constant reward offset that acts as an implicit incentive for survival. Using control as inference, we derive two off-policy and replay-compatible, regularized algorithms with post-violation semantics. Absorbing-state ends the decision process, so only surviving decisions pay policy KL, yielding AS-SAC. Virtual termination stops reward credit while the process continues, retaining ordinary discounted KL and yielding VT-MPO. To connect SDH with cumulative-cost CMDPs, we introduce violation-depth profiles. Under exponential-tail single-scale profiles, the SDH statistic determines cumulative cost; departures from this form mark where the connection breaks. Experiments validate both the method and this predicted scope. On the 90-muscle H2190 humanoid in Hyfydy, VT-MPO matches the EWA reference in peak gait realism, with its highest observed gait-match checkpoint at 21M environment steps versus 90M for EWA and markedly more stable training. On Safety Gymnasium, violation-depth profiles predict the regimes in which SDH achieves strong reward-violation trade-offs.
Sources
- Lyapunov-based Safe Policy Optimization for Continuous Control
- Safe Exploration in Continuous Action Spaces
- Reinforcement Learning and Control as Probabilistic Inference: Tutorial and Review
- Approximate Inference and Stochastic Optimal Control
- Benchmarking Batch Deep Reinforcement Learning Algorithms
Related papers
- Polynomial-Augmented Neural Networks (PANNs) with Weak Orthogonality Constraints for Enhanced Function and PDE Approximation
- AIRL-S: Unifying Reinforcement Learning and Search-Based Test-Time Scaling via Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning
- Transformers as Bayesian In-Context Experimenters: Smoothness-Adaptive Efficient ATE Estimation
- Convergence issues in Relational Concept Analysis based on AOC-posets
- Beliefs Beyond Posteriors: The Predictive Cost of ELBO Binding
- Understanding Diffusion Models via Ratio-Based Function Approximation with SignReLU Networks