From Associations to Activations: Comparing Behavioral and Hidden-State Semantic Geometry in LLMs

arXiv:2602.00628 · cs.LG, cs.AI, cs.CL · Submitted 2026-01-31 · Read on arXiv

cs.LG, cs.AI, cs.CL

Submitted: 2026-01-31

Updated: 2026-10-12

Comments: Published at the 43rd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2026), Seoul, South Korea. 27 pages, 16 figures, 6 tables. Code: https://github.com/schiekiera/llm-association-geometry. Data: https://huggingface.co/datasets/schiekiera/llm-association-geometry

Journal ref: Proceedings of the 43rd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2026), PMLR 306, 2026

Code: https://github.com/schiekiera/llm-association-geometry

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: We investigate the extent to which an LLM's hidden-state geometry can be recovered from its behavior in psycholinguistic experiments.

Terminology

Abstract

We investigate the extent to which an LLM's hidden-state geometry can be recovered from its behavior in psycholinguistic experiments. Across eight instruction-tuned transformer models, we run two experimental paradigms -- similarity-based forced choice and free association -- over a shared 5,000-word vocabulary, collecting 17.5M+ trials to build behavior-based similarity matrices. Using representational similarity analysis, we compare behavioral geometries to layerwise hidden-state similarity and benchmark against FastText, BERT, and cross-model consensus. We find that forced-choice behavior aligns substantially more with hidden-state geometry than free association. In a held-out-words regression, behavioral similarity (especially forced choice) predicts unseen hidden-state similarities beyond lexical baselines and cross-model consensus, indicating that behavior-only measurements retain recoverable information about internal semantic geometry. Finally, we discuss implications for the ability of behavioral tasks to uncover hidden cognitive states.

Sources

Related papers