Lies We Can Trust: Quantifying Action Uncertainty with Inaccurate Stochastic Dynamics through Conformalized Nonholonomic Lie groups

arXiv:2512.10294 · cs.RO, cs.SY, eess.SY · Submitted 2025-12-11 · Read on arXiv

cs.RO, cs.SY, eess.SY

Submitted: 2025-12-11

Updated: 2026-08-22

Comments: 12 pages, 7 figures, 4 tables. Published in IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters. Extended version with appendix. Project page: https://um-arm-lab.github.io/claps/

Journal ref: IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 4801-4808 (2026)

DOI: 10.1109/LRA.2026.3656773

Code: https://github.com/UM-ARM-Lab/claps

Project page: https://um-arm-lab.github.io/claps

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: We propose Conformal Lie-group Action Prediction Sets (CLAPS), a symmetry-aware conformal prediction-based algorithm that constructs, for a given action, a set guaranteed to contain the resulting

Terminology

Abstract

We propose Conformal Lie-group Action Prediction Sets (CLAPS), a symmetry-aware conformal prediction-based algorithm that constructs, for a given action, a set guaranteed to contain the resulting system configuration at a user-defined probability. Our assurance holds under both aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty, non-asymptotically, and does not require strong assumptions about the true system dynamics, the uncertainty sources, or the quality of the approximate dynamics model. Typically, uncertainty quantification is tackled by making strong assumptions about the error distribution or magnitude, or by relying on uncalibrated uncertainty estimates - i.e., with no link to frequentist probabilities - which are insufficient for safe control. Recently, conformal prediction has emerged as a statistical framework capable of providing distribution-free probabilistic guarantees on test-time prediction accuracy. While current conformal methods treat robot configurations as Euclidean points, many systems have non-Euclidean configurations, e.g., some mobile robots have SE(2). In this work, we rigorously analyze configuration errors using Lie groups, extending previous Euclidean space theoretical guarantees to SE(2). Our experiments on a simulated JetBot, and on a real MBot, suggest that by considering the configuration space's structure, our symmetry-informed nonconformity score leads to more volume-efficient prediction regions which represent the underlying uncertainty better than existing approaches.

Sources

Related papers