Gravity-induced entanglement is not a theory-independent witness of nonclassicality of the gravitational field

arXiv:2511.02683 · gr-qc, quant-ph · Submitted 2025-11-04 · Read on arXiv

gr-qc, quant-ph

Submitted: 2025-11-04

Updated: 2026-09-16

Comments: 11 pages, improved version accepted for publication in PRD. previous versions of this manuscript used to be titled "The simple reason why classical gravity can entangle," which is now the title of an essay (https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271826410075)

DOI: 10.1103/r8ry-sp35

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The gist: Gravity-induced entanglement (GIE) experiments have been proposed as a theory-independent test of the quantum nature of gravity, on the strength of several no-go theorems concluding that GIE

Terminology

Abstract

Gravity-induced entanglement (GIE) experiments have been proposed as a theory-independent test of the quantum nature of gravity, on the strength of several no-go theorems concluding that GIE detection implies the gravitational interaction is either nonlocal or nonclassical. This is in apparent tension with a growing number of papers claiming that theories with a classical gravitational field do predict GIE. This article resolves the tension by reviewing the assumptions of the no-go theorems and highlighting the information-theoretic, rather than spatiotemporal, nature of the locality assumption. This makes violating locality not particularly problematic. Indeed, quantum electrodynamics and perturbative quantum gravity are nonlocal in the sense of the theorems. Thus, simple detection GIE is not sufficient to rule out a classical gravitational field and we will need quantitative comparison of theoretical predictions in the low-energy quantum gravity regime to test whether the gravitational field is quantum or classical.

Sources

Related papers