Topological photonics in nanoscaled systems with far field radiation and polarization singularities

arXiv:2508.20487 · physics.optics, cond-mat.mes-hall · Submitted 2025-08-28 · Read on arXiv

Listen

Radio episode about this paper

Transcript

Introduction to the show: ident: Quantum Radio. Generated commentary on the latest quantum physics and condensed matter papers.

Kai: I'm Kai.

Mira: And I'm Mira, here with Lev.

Kai: Today's paper: "Topological photonics in nanoscaled systems with far field radiation and polarization singularities".

Mira: The gist The topological photonics framework needs to be extended by a more comprehensive approach that properly treats such nanophotonic intrinsic effects and, in particular,

Kai: First, who's behind it and why it matters.

Title and authors: Kai: Let's look at the authors of this paper, G. Salerno and Dipartimento di Fisica “E. Fermi” at Università di Pisa in Italy. They bring a background in both applied physics and condensed matter theory to this work on topological photonics.

Mira: They are drawing on concepts from both sides, which is good because it helps bridge the gap between the abstract topological ideas and what we can actually build in nanoscale devices.

Lev: It’s interesting because this paper is focused on extending band theory, which means they are looking at how to make these topological models work when you introduce more realistic physics.

Kai: They specifically look at systems where far-field radiation and polarization singularities become key ingredients for the topological phenomena they want to study.

Mira: So the central idea seems to be that incorporating long-range, radiative, and retardation effects into the simple Hermitian tight-binding picture isn't applicable anymore.

Lev: That makes sense because when you go nanoscale, unintended radiation leakage becomes something that dominates a lot of the time.

Kai: They are showing how these radiative effects can strongly constrain the quality factor of those modes and degrade nonlinear interaction strength.

Mira: So, the paper is pushing back against assuming that the simple tight-binding picture works perfectly when you include all these real-world physics.

The paper's summary: Kai: The summary of "Topological photonics in nanoscaled systems with far field radiation and polarization singularities" really boils down to needing a more comprehensive approach to topological band theory for photonic crystals.

Mira: They start by setting up the standard expansion using Bloch’s theorem, where you have the electric field and dielectric function expanded in Fourier modes using reciprocal lattice vectors G.

Lev: And they then apply perturbation theory to get an effective Hamiltonian, which involves terms like omegaG deltaGG prime plus pG prime dot pG delta epsilon GG prime.

Kai: That term involving delta epsilon is what provides the coupling between waves coming from different diffracted orders, which is crucial for understanding mode interactions.

Mira: They then define the Berry connection and the Berry curvature, and they show how this leads to a topological invariant like the Chern number C in 2D systems <ref:2508.20487#pg2>.

Lev: But they are moving beyond that simple bulk picture because they need to consider what happens when you introduce polarization singularities into that framework.

Kai: That's where the paper gets interesting, because polarization singularities might play a role in defining the topological invariants in the far field, which are not fully captured by just looking at the bulk observables alone.

Mira: So they are suggesting that these far-field effects and polarization structures are not just noise but actual ingredients for topological phenomena in nanoscaled systems.

The paper's improvements: Lev: The improvements suggested here focus on how we can move toward a more generalized eigenvalue problem instead of just the standard one.

Kai: They suggest that applying perturbation theory to simplify the effective Hamiltonian is not always sufficient, so you need to use a more complete approach.

Mira: Specifically, they point out that the master equation is a generalized eigenvalue problem because epsilon hat is not proportional to an identity matrix.

Lev: So what they are proposing is that we use methods like generalized eigenvalue problems to explore regimes beyond standard theory to realize novel Dirac-like degeneracies unique to photonic bands.

Kai: That opens up avenues for inverse design, which means the AI could potentially design photonic crystals with specific topological protection by modeling and optimizing non-Hermitian effective Hamiltonians derived from a lossy nature and coupling terms.

Mira: They are also exploring using frameworks that include generalized eigenvalue problems to realize novel Dirac-like degeneracies unique to photonic bands, which is what you need for the next step.

Conclusion: Kai: So wrapping up the paper "Topological photonics in nanoscaled systems with far field radiation and polarization singularities", it seems they are emphasizing how we need to look beyond just bulk observables.

Mira: They conclude that incorporating polarization singularities into standard topological band theory gives us a better picture of what happens when light radiates into the far field.

Lev: The implication for hardware is that we should be looking at how these polarization vortices and BICs can be indicators for topological phase transitions, which could help us find new ways to build stable systems.

Kai: So the paper suggests using structured light and interferometry to probe these polarization vortices, or reconstructing non-Hermitian topological invariants from radiation patterns as a way forward.

Mira: It’s about pushing toward capturing the full topological picture by using generalized eigenvalue problems and response functions from left eigenvectors, especially in the strong coupling regime.

Lev: For me, it’s about recognizing that pushing topological photonics into the strong coupling regime might unlock entirely new classes of topological quasiparticles and robust quantum optical phenomena in the nanoscale domain.

G. Salerno, Dipartimento di Fisica “E. Fermi”, Università di Pisa

Department of Applied Physics, Aalto University School of Science · Università di Pisa

physics.optics, cond-mat.mes-hall

Submitted: 2025-08-28

Updated: 2026-10-14

Comments: Perspective article

Journal ref: Appl. Phys. Lett. 127, 080501 (2025)

DOI: 10.1063/5.0283167

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Importance score: 80/100

The gist: The gist The topological photonics framework needs to be extended by a more comprehensive approach that properly treats such nanophotonic intrinsic effects and, in particular, the interplay of

Key concepts

Topological Phase Transitions
These occur when the energy band gap in a material closes and then reopens. During this transition, the wavefunctions undergo a singular change in their topology, similar to how piercing a sphere changes its shape into a torus. This is analogous to fundamental topological changes in physics.
Bound States in the Continuum (BICs)
BICs are localized light modes that appear within dispersive bands and are decoupled from free-space radiation. They are protected from decay by a quantized topological charge, which describes how the light's polarization vector winds around the BIC’s momentum, essentially acting as a vortex center.
Far-Field Berry Curvature
This quantity is derived from the electric far field and measures how the polarization changes with respect to wavevector changes. It is used to extract topological information in experimental setups, such as exciton-polariton microcavities, providing a way to characterize topological features beyond bulk properties.

Summary

The gist The topological photonics framework needs to be extended by a more comprehensive approach that properly treats such nanophotonic intrinsic effects and, in particular, the interplay of polarization and far-field radiation.

Introduction to Topological Photonics

Topology is a powerful framework for controlling and manipulating light, minimizing detrimental perturbations on the photonic properties Topology is a powerful framework for controlling and manipulating light, minimizing detrimental perturbations on the photonic properties. Nanophotonics is characterized by subtle phenomena that are not usually considered in other topological models’ realizations, such as nonlocality, strong field confinement, and light radiating to the farfield continuum. The ability to engineer matter at the nanoscale is a research field that has revolutionized science and technology. Nanophotonic systems offer unprecedented ways of controlling light at room temperature with remarkable features, from ultrafast dynamics in the order of femtoseconds and chip-scale integration to band dispersion control and light confinement into volumes beyond the diffraction limit [1–3]. Topology emerges as a promising research avenue to protect systems from disorder and imperfections.

Topological Concepts in Photonics

Topological phase transitions happen when the band gap closes and reopens, during which the bands become degenerate and the wavefunctions undergo a singular change in their topology, similar to piercing a sphere to transform it into a torus. Dirac points are a fundamental type of band degeneracy, around which topological properties, such as non-zero Berry phases, are often found. Weyl points in 3D and exceptional points in non-Hermitian systems with gain and loss have received great attention in photonics as a playground for topological phenomena. Chiral effects are another interesting aspect of topological implementations, where breaking in-plane symmetries with chiral structures might lift mode degeneracies and generate nonzero local Berry curvatures in the photonic bands.

Band Theory and Bulk Topology

A photonic band is formed by a refractive-index landscape ε(r) = ε(r+a), where a defines the photonic crystal periodicity. Applying Bloch’s theorem, both the electric field and the dielectric function are expanded in Fourier modes using the basis of the reciprocal lattice vectors G as ε(r) = ∑G εGe iG·r, and E(r) = ∑ G e i(k+G)·rψG(k)EG(k)⟩. The problem can be simplified to a standard eigenvalue problem by applying perturbation theory, with the components of the effective Hamiltonian being Hˆeff(k) G,G′ ≈ ωGδG,G' + pG′ ·pG∆εG−G′. From the eigenfunction ψ(k)⟩ of the effective Hamiltonian in Eq. (5), the Berry connection is defined as A(k) = i⟨ψ(k)∇kψ(k)⟩. The curl of Eq. (6) yields another gauge-invariant quantity, namely the Berry curvature B(k) = ∇k ×A(k). For 2D systems, the only nonzero component of the Berry curvature is Bz, and its integral over the entire Brillouin zone is the Chern number C = 1/2π R BZ z / k a topological invariant of the integer quantum Hall effect.

Non-Hermitian Systems and Bound States in Continuum (BICs)

Recent years have seen a growing interest in the interplay of topology and non-Hermiticity. Non-Hermitian photonics describes systems with optical loss and gain, where band gaps can be classified into two main categories: line gaps and point gaps. Bound states in the continuum (BICs) are localized modes embedded in dispersive bands appearing as light polarization singularities decoupled from the free-space radiation. BICs are protected from radiation decay by the existence of a quantized topological charge that tells how often the light polarization vector winds around the BIC’s momentum, namely its vortex center. The topological charge q of a symmetry-protected mode can be derived as qirrep = 1− n / 2π arg(εirrep), where εirrep is the character of that representation under a 2π/n rotation and is taken from the Cn character table.

Far-Field Topology and Polarization Singularities

The electric far field can be defined as EF ∝ Rˆψ⟩ = ∑ G cG pG, where Rˆ is a N × 2 matrix containing N (2 components) column vectors of the polarization directions pG, and ψ⟩ = (… cG …) T is the N components eigenmode of the effective Hamiltonian in Eq. (15). The far-field Berry connection is defined analogously to the bulk Berry connection in Eq. (6) as Af(kx, ky) = i⟨E∇kE⟩ = −cos2 θ / 2 ∂kx φ ˆkx +∂ky φ ˆky. The corresponding far-field Berry curvature is Bf(kx, ky) = ∇k ×Af(kx, ky)·ˆkz = 1/2 sinθ ∂kx / ∂φ∂ky φ −∂ky / ∂θ∂kx φ. This formula has been widely used to extract the Berry curvature in exciton-polariton planar microcavities [84, 85, 130, 131]. The polarization vortex of charge q is a source of −πq Berry phase, a feature that has been utilized to obtain optical spin-Hall effect from the topological charge of BICs [135, 136].

Limitations and Future Directions

The discrepancy between bulk and far-field topology suggests a broader issue about photonic systems operating in regimes that fall outside the assumptions of standard topological band theory. Topological charges of BICs can be exchanged during band inversions, suggesting they can be a good indicator for topological phase transitions. Looking ahead, promising directions include the use of structured light and interferometry to probe polarization vortices, and the reconstruction of non-Hermitian topological invariants from radiation patterns. Floquet theory is a well-established framework for treating quantum system under periodic time modulations, used to induce properties that are absent in their static counterpart. Synthetic dimensions might offer even greater advantages, such as enhanced field confinement, access to otherwise inaccessible topological regimes, or even create nonstandard hyperbolic or fractal geometries.

Concluding Remarks

Topological photonics is a powerful framework that has matured rapidly over the past decade, both in fundamental science and technological applications. Far-field radiation may be a rich source of topological structure and nonlocal effects, manifesting through BICs or circularly-polarized states. Theoretical approaches that incorporate generalized eigenvalue problems, full non-Hermitian Berry curvatures, and response functions from left eigenvectors may be fundamental for capturing the full topological picture. Ultimately, pushing topological photonics into the strong coupling regime might unlock entirely new classes of topological quasiparticles and robust quantum optical phenomena in the nanoscale domain.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to K. Arjas, A. Gianfrate, H.S. Nguyen, and D. Trypogeorgos for fruitful discussions. This work was supported by the Research Council of Finland under the Academy Research Fellowship project n. 13354165, and by the Italian Ministry of University and Research under the Rita LeviMontalcini program.

References

[1] A. F. Koenderink, A. Alù, and A. Polman, “Nanophotonics: shrinking light-based technology,” Science 348, 516–521 (2015).

[2] W. Wang, M. Ramezani, A. I. Väkeväinen, P. Törmä, J. G. Rivas, and T. W. Odom, “The rich photonic world of plasmonic nanoparticle arrays,” Materials Today 21, 303 (2018).

[3] C. Wang, M. Zhang, B. Stern, M. Lipson, and M. Loncar, ˇ “Nanophotonic lithium niobate electro-optic modulators,” Optics express 26, 1547–1555 (2018).

[4] V. G. Kravets, A. V. Kabashin, W. L. Barnes, and A. N. Grigorenko, “Plasmonic surface lattice resonances: a review of properties and applications,” Chemical Reviews 118, 5912 (2018).

[5] A. Karabchevsky, A. Katiyi, A. S. Ang, and A. Hazan, “Onchip nanophotonics and future challenges,” Nanophotonics 9, 3733–3753 (2020).

[6] A. González-Tudela, A. Reiserer, J. J. García-Ripoll, and F. J. García-Vidal, “Light–matter interactions in quantum nanophotonic devices,” Nature Reviews Physics 6, 166–179 (2024).

Improvements for AI systems

  1. System can predict topological invariants in far-field radiation by incorporating polarization singularities into standard topological band theory, as highlighted by We highlight the emerging role that polarization singularities might play in defining the topological invariants in the far field, which are not fully captured by bulk observables alone.

  2. AI system can design photonic crystals with specific topological protection by modeling and optimizing non-Hermitian effective Hamiltonians derived from a lossy nature and coupling terms, enabling the creation of modes like Bound states in the continuum (BICs) protected from radiation decay by the existence of a quantized topological charge.

  3. The system can perform inverse design for topological photonic structures by utilizing frameworks that include generalized eigenvalue problems, allowing it to explore regimes beyond standard theory to realize novel Dirac-like degeneracies unique to photonic bands.

  4. The improved system can analyze experimental far-field data and infer bulk topological properties by applying the derived formulas for far-field Berry curvature, such as Bf(kx, ky) = 1/2 sinθ ∂kx/∂φ θ∂ky / (∂ky/∂θ ∂kx / φ), to map observed polarization textures onto topological charges.

  5. The system can develop robust models for non-Hermitian photonics by reconstructing the left eigenvectors from measurable quantities like Stokes parameters, which are linked to the system’s response to external perturbations, providing deeper insights into the full non-Hermitian properties of the system.

Abstract

Topology is a powerful framework for controlling and manipulating light, minimizing detrimental perturbations on the photonic properties. Combining nanophotonics with topological concepts presents opportunities for both fundamental physics and technological applications. Although most topological photonic realizations have been inspired by condensed-matter analogue models, new topological ideas have just begun to be realized at the nanoscale. Nanophotonics is characterized by subtle phenomena that are not usually considered in other topological models' realizations, such as nonlocality, strong field confinement, and light radiating to the far-field continuum. In this perspective, we will discuss how standard topological band theory for photonic crystals needs to be extended by a more comprehensive approach that properly treats such nanophotonic intrinsic effects and, in particular, the interplay of polarization and far-field radiation. We highlight the emerging role that polarization singularities might play in defining the topological invariants in the far field, which are not fully captured by bulk observables alone. We conclude by outlining a set of open questions and promising directions for exploring novel concepts in topological nanophotonics and shaping next-generation photonic devices.

Sources

Related papers