Split the Yield, Share the Risk: Pricing, Hedging and Fixed rates in DeFi
Listen
Radio episode about this paper
Transcript
Introduction to the show: ident: Robotics Radio. Generated commentary on the latest robotics and control papers.
Rosa: I'm Rosa, and with me are Dev and Taro, guest researcher.
Dev: Today's paper: "Split the Yield, Share the Risk".
Rosa: The gist The authors present a formal treatment of yield tokenization,
Dev: First, who's behind it and why it matters.
Paper summary: Rosa: To recap this paper "Split the Yield, Share the Risk: Pricing, Hedging and Fixed rates in DeFi," they are presenting a formal way to decompose yield-bearing assets into their principal part and their yield part.
Dev: The thesis is that this decomposition helps with risk transfer and price discovery within decentralized finance. They propose a model using stochastic differential equations to characterize how these yield tokens move over time.
Rosa: And the main claim is they derive a no-arbitrage pricing framework for these tokens, which lets you use them to hedge against future yield volatility and manage interest rate risk in lending pools.
Dev: They take DeFi lending as their main focus, showing exactly how borrowers and lenders can use these yield tokens to hit optimal hedging outcomes while also dealing with potential manipulation of interest rates.
Taro: They also design automated market makers that incorporate a menu of bonding curves specifically to aggregate liquidity from participants who have different risk preferences.
Rosa: This part suggests the mechanism is designed to be efficient and incentive-compatible for trading both the yield tokens themselves and yield futures.
Dev: And on top of all that, they build a modular fixed-rate lending protocol that merges these on-chain yield token markets with actual lending pools to make interest rate discovery robust.
Taro: Essentially, this work provides the theoretical backing for risk management and fixed-income infrastructure in DeFi, offering practical ways to create stable and sustainable yield markets.
Rosa: It's about taking something complex like yield in DeFi and making it manageable by splitting it up into predictable components.
Conclusion: Dev: So looking at "Split the Yield, Share the Risk: Pricing, Hedging and Fixed rates in DeFi," it’s about taking yield tokens and making them usable for hedging interest rate risk.
Rosa: The authors are Viraj Nadkarni Pramod Viswanath and August seven two thousand twenty-five is when this was published <ref:2505.22784#pg1>. They're giving us a framework for how to price these tokens fairly using no-arbitrage conditions.
Dev: What that means for someone listening is that it opens up new ways to manage uncertainty in lending pools, not just by being passive, but by actively structuring your position with these tokens.
Rosa: It’s about making sure that when you deposit funds into a DeFi protocol, you have tools to lock in the interest rate environment you expect for a certain period.
Dev: And this extends beyond just lending; they show how this approach applies to other yield-bearing actions like AMMs and staking as well.
Taro: The implication is that permissionless systems can be made much more robust by incorporating these structured financial tools, allowing for better capital efficiency.
Rosa: It suggests that programmable tokenization isn't just a gimmick; it’s a way to extend core financial infrastructure into decentralized settings in a sustainable way.
Dev: It moves the discussion toward creating markets where yield is not just something you earn, but something you can actively price and insure against risk.
econ.TH, cs.SY, eess.SY
Submitted: 2025-05-28
Updated: 2026-10-13
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Importance score: 76/100
The gist: The gist The authors present a formal treatment of yield tokenization, proposing a model to characterize yield token dynamics using stochastic differential equations and deriving a no-arbitrage
Key concepts
- Yield Tokenization
- This is the process of taking an asset that pays interest (yield) and splitting it into two parts: the principal amount and a token representing the future yield. This allows users to separate their investment, making it easier to manage risk and trade the yield component separately from the main asset.
- Yield Tokenizer
- A smart contract that facilitates this split. A holder deposits an asset into this contract for a set time, receiving a principal token and a yield token. The yield token represents the right to collect all future interest accrued on the underlying asset during that period.
Terminology
Summary
The gist The authors present a formal treatment of yield tokenization, proposing a model to characterize yield token dynamics using stochastic differential equations and deriving a no-arbitrage pricing framework for these tokens, which facilitates risk transfer and price discovery in decentralized finance (DeFi).
Yield Tokenization Model
Definition 1 (Yield Bearing Token)
The paper defines a yield bearing token as a fungible token A
where the holder accrues a reward paid either in A, or in some underlying numeraire N, or in a mix of tokens Ai
.
Definition 3 (Yield Tokenizer)
A yield tokenizer is defined as a smart contract that allows a holder to deposit A into the contract for a time-to-maturity T in exchange for minting a principal token P and a yield token Y
.
Definition 5 (Yield Token)
A yield token is defined as the right to collect all future yield accrued on the underlying token A, until such a time when either the holder decides to sell or send Y to another holder, or the time-to-maturity T is reached
.
The model assumes that asset prices change stochastically via the vector stochastic differential equation dX¯t = ¯µt(X¯t)dt + Σt(X¯t)dW¯t.
Fair Pricing and No Arbitrage
The fair price of a yield token is derived by applying the canonical no arbitrage condition, resulting in Theorem 1, which states that the price of a yield token Y with maturity T is given by P T Y(t, X¯t) = E[Z T t e - R s t r(u)duY¯ (s, X¯s) · X¯sds].
Corollary 1 claims that a portfolio of yield tokens with varying maturities, priced according to Theorem 1, cannot have an arbitrage opportunity
.
Risk Management in Lending Pools
Lenders and borrowers can use yield tokens to hedge against interest rate uncertainty; specifically, a borrower might buy the yield token to lock in the interest amount they pay in a specific time period
.
Theorem 1 shows that All lenders and borrowers can completely hedge their positions till time T, after selling/buying the yield token at a price equal to the fair price E[Y]
.
The presence of a yield tokenizer leads to increased welfare for lending pool participants, as shown in Theorem 2, where the welfare of the lending pool participants increases in presence of a yield tokenizer
.
Market Maker Design and Liquidity Aggregation
The paper designs an automated market maker (AMM) that incorporates a menu of bonding curves to aggregate liquidity from participants with heterogeneous risk preferences
.
Corollary 4 defines the optimally efficient menu as a tuple Ψ(x0, y0, UP, Y1, · · ·, Yn) = (ψ1, ψ2, · · ·, ψn) where each curve ψj in the menu is optimally efficient
.
The liquidity provider can improve revenue by taking into account the risk preferences of traders by designing a menu of bonding curves with fees to earn premia from higher risk aversion.
Fixed Rate Lending Protocol
A modular fixed-rate lending protocol is proposed that synthesizes on-chain yield token markets and lending pools, enabling robust interest rate discovery and enhancing capital efficiency
.
The protocol allows a borrower to have an effectively fixed interest rate
by simulating the selling of yield futures in the AMMs corresponding to the asset.
Slashing Insurance Markets
Yield tokenization for liquid staking tokens opens up hedging opportunities for users, including gas fee hedging and slashing risk insurance
.
Lemma 9 provides the amount of native token N a liquid staker should spend to buy insurance against slashing, given the probability pS that a slashing event will occur.
The analysis shows that holding the principal token can act as a form of insurance, where the value of the principal token would rise from 1 to 1−p
in case of slashing.
The paper concludes that by modeling agents with heterogeneous beliefs and designing market makers that aggregate liquidity across diverse risk preferences, programmable tokenization can replicate and extend core financial infrastructure within a permissionless setting.
Improvements for AI systems
-
Bold price discovery in yield markets using a menu of bonding curves: The system can design
a menu of bonding curves to aggregate liquidity from participants with heterogeneous risk preferences
and use these to create anefficient and incentive-compatible mechanism for trading yield tokens and yield futures.
-
Fixed rate lending optimization: The protocol can synthesize
on-chain yield token markets and lending pools, enabling robust interest rate discovery,
leading to amodular fixed-rate lending protocol that synthesizes on-chain yield token markets and lending pools, enabling robust interest rate discovery and enhancing capital efficiency.
-
Risk hedging for borrowers and lenders: The system can enable participants to hedge against interest rate uncertainty by allowing
borrowers
tobuy the yield token
tolock in the interest amount they pay in a specific time period,
which helps both partieshedge against interest rate manipulation by an adversary.
-
Optimized liquidity provision via risk-aware bonding curves: The Automated Market Makers (AMMs) can be designed so that liquidity providers can
specify their bonding curve as per their risk appetite,
allowing them toearn premia from higher risk aversion,
which leads to a more efficient transfer of interest rate risk. -
Slashing insurance markets for liquid staking: The system can provide a mechanism where a liquid staker can buy principal tokens to insure against slashing, with the required amount being determined by the formula:
pI = pS / (1 − p + pS E[Qn i=1(1 + Yi)]).
Abstract
We present the first formal treatment of yield tokenization, a mechanism that decomposes yield-bearing assets into principal and yield components to facilitate risk transfer and price discovery in decentralized finance (DeFi). We propose a model that characterizes yield token dynamics using stochastic differential equations. We derive a no-arbitrage pricing framework for yield tokens, enabling their use in hedging future yield volatility and managing interest rate risk in decentralized lending pools. Taking DeFi lending as our focus, we show how both borrowers and lenders can use yield tokens to achieve optimal hedging outcomes and mitigate exposure to adversarial interest rate manipulation. Furthermore, we design automated market makers (AMMs) that incorporate a menu of bonding curves to aggregate liquidity from participants with heterogeneous risk preferences. This leads to an efficient and incentive-compatible mechanism for trading yield tokens and yield futures. Building on these foundations, we propose a modular fixed-rate lending protocol that synthesizes on-chain yield token markets and lending pools, enabling robust interest rate discovery and enhancing capital efficiency. Our work provides the theoretical underpinnings for risk management and fixed-income infrastructure in DeFi, offering practical mechanisms for stable and sustainable yield markets.
Sources
- When does the tail wag the dog? Curvature and market making
- Replicating Market Makers
- AgileRate: Bringing Adaptivity and Robustness to DeFi Lending Markets
- Optimal risk-aware interest rates for decentralized lending protocols
- Metamagnetic phase transition in ferromagnetic superconductor URhGe
- A Curationary Tale: Logarithmic Regret in DeFi Lending via Dynamic Pricing
- Perpetual Demand Lending Pools
- Attacks on Dynamic DeFi Interest Rate Curves
- Liquidity Provider Returns in Geometric Mean Markets
- DeFi Protocols for Loanable Funds: Interest Rates, Liquidity and Market Efficiency
- Fair Interest Rates Are Impossible for Lending Pools: Results from Options Pricing
- Automated Market Making and Arbitrage Profits in the Presence of Fees
- A Myersonian Framework for Optimal Liquidity Provision in Automated Market Makers
- ZeroSwap: Data-driven Optimal Market Making in DeFi
- Adaptive Curves for Optimally Efficient Market Making
- Loss-Versus-Rebalancing under Deterministic and Generalized block-times