Innovative Thinking, Infinite Humor: Humor Research of Large Language Models through Structured Thought Leaps
cs.AI
Submitted: 2024-10-14
Updated: 2025-04-11
Journal ref: In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2025), pp. 25365-25389, 2025
Code: https://github.com/Leymore/ruozhiba
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
The gist: Humor is previously regarded as a gift exclusive to humans for the following reasons.
Terminology
Abstract
Humor is previously regarded as a gift exclusive to humans for the following reasons. Humor is a culturally nuanced aspect of human language, presenting challenges for its understanding and generation. Humor generation necessitates a multi-hop reasoning process, with each hop founded on proper rationales. Although many studies, such as those related to GPT-o1, focus on logical reasoning with reflection and correction, they still fall short in humor generation. Due to the sparsity of the knowledge graph in creative thinking, it is arduous to achieve multi-hop reasoning. Consequently, in this paper, we propose a more robust framework for addressing the humor reasoning task, named LoL. LoL aims to inject external information to mitigate the sparsity of the knowledge graph, thereby enabling multi-hop reasoning. In the first stage of LoL, we put forward an automatic instruction-evolution method to incorporate the deeper and broader thinking processes underlying humor. Judgment-oriented instructions are devised to enhance the model's judgment capability, dynamically supplementing and updating the sparse knowledge graph. Subsequently, through reinforcement learning, the reasoning logic for each online-generated response is extracted using GPT-4o. In this process, external knowledge is re-introduced to aid the model in logical reasoning and the learning of human preferences. Finally, experimental results indicate that the combination of these two processes can enhance both the model's judgment ability and its generative capacity. These findings deepen our comprehension of the creative capabilities of large language models (LLMs) and offer approaches to boost LLMs' creative abilities for cross-domain innovative applications.
Sources
- Help me write a poem: Instruction Tuning as a Vehicle for Collaborative Poetry Writing
- Towards Conversational Humor Analysis and Design
- MiniGPT-v2: large language model as a unified interface for vision-language multi-task learning
- DreamLLM: Synergistic Multimodal Comprehension and Creation
- PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Model
- Stimulating Creativity with FunLines: A Case Study of Humor Generation in Headlines
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models
- MemeCap: A Dataset for Captioning and Interpreting Memes
- FollowBench: A Multi-level Fine-grained Constraints Following Benchmark for Large Language Models
- Step-DPO: Step-wise Preference Optimization for Long-chain Reasoning of LLMs
- Analogical Reasoning on Chinese Morphological and Semantic Relations
- Self-Alignment with Instruction Backtranslation
- Let's Verify Step by Step
- Large Language Model Guided Tree-of-Thought
- ReFT: Reasoning with Reinforced Fine-Tuning
- Cards Against AI: Predicting Humor in a Fill-in-the-blank Party Game
- O1 Replication Journey: A Strategic Progress Report -- Part 1
- InFoBench: Evaluating Instruction Following Ability in Large Language Models
- Language Models Are Greedy Reasoners: A Systematic Formal Analysis of Chain-of-Thought
- Conifer: Improving Complex Constrained Instruction-Following Ability of Large Language Models
Related papers
- MAVEN-T: Reinforced Heterogeneous Distillation for Real-Time Multi-Agent Trajectory Prediction
- Model Discovery Agent: LLM-assisted Bayesian experiment design for data-efficient discovery of mechanistic world models
- Agents' Last Exam
- The Clinician's Veto: Navigating Trust, Liability, and Uncertainty in Autonomous AI Prescribing
- MindHelper: Closed-Loop Embodied Mental-State Reasoning for Precision Intervention
- Incumbent Advantage: Brand Bias and Cognitive Manipulation Dynamics in LLM Recommendation Systems