Extraction of geometric and transport parameters from the time constant of exocytosis transients measured by nanoscale electrodes

arXiv:2410.06631 · q-bio.SC, q-bio.QM · Submitted 2024-10-09 · Read on arXiv

Listen

Radio episode about this paper

Transcript

Introduction to the show: ident: Genomics Radio. Generated commentary on the latest computational biology and genomics papers.

Ines: We're looking at the paper: "Extraction of geometric and transport parameters from the time constant of exocytosis transients measured by nanoscale electrodes".

Marcus: Here's the gist of the paper. Extraction of geometric and transport parameters from the time constant of exocytosis transients measured by nanoscale electrodes develops scaling laws for the decay time constant (τ) for VIEC single-exponential transients through analytical models and large scale simulations The model predictions are then calibrated against detailed numerical simulations to develop a closed form expression for τ Model System Description In VIEC, vesicles filled with bio-molecules come in contact with an UME resulting in the opening of a pore As the pore opens at time t = 0, the biomolecules diffuse through the pore and reach the sensor Electrochemical reaction at the UME results in a current (see Fig.

Ines: 1b) which is proportional to the net flux of bio-molecules at the sensor surface The transient decay signal of VIEC will be a good representative of such exocytosis events The key parameter that characterises the measured signal in non-dense core vesicles is the time constant (τ) of the exponential decay of the signal post 75% of peak Analytical Derivation The time constants for the exponential decay of VIEC transients can be estimated once we identify an appropriate rate equation for the flux at the sensor surface The time constant for the VIEC transients measured at the sensor is given as: τ = K R cubed h 0.31 d 0.07 w-1.68 Dint (1 + 1/γ) This expression is derived by assuming the pore width remains unchanged after it reaches its peak Simulation Validation The simulation results indicate that τ varies as ≈ R cubed and ≈ w-2, which is close to the power law anticipated by our analytical model The variation in the value of α and β is in a very narrow range indicating that the power law is a good estimate for the decay constant The root mean square percent error (RMSPE) of the analytical τ with simulation τ is 6.44% Application and Conclusion The key insight that emerges from our analytical predictions and subsequently verified by numerical simulations is the analytical expression for τ given in equation 7 Our model predictions compare very well with experimental data and allows better estimates for back extraction of key parameters related to exocytosis The model enables better estimation of pore width and intra-vesicular diffusion coefficient by combining with the FESA methodology in the case of VIEC with resistance pulse In summary, our proposed analytical expression in equation 7 for τ compares well with extensive numerical simulations for VIEC and reported experimental data References

1: J.

Marcus: D.

Ines: Keighron, Y.

Title and authors: Ines: So we’re going to talk about what this paper is actually proposing—the title itself, "Extraction of geometric and transport parameters from the time constant of exocytosis transients measured by nanoscale electrodes." It sounds very technical, but fundamentally it’s about using a specific measurement—the decay time constant tau—to back-calculate physical dimensions.

Marcus: Right. The authors are Sundeep Kapila and Pradeep R. Nair, and they are essentially taking the transient signals from VIEC events and using analytical models to map that signal decay onto geometric parameters like pore width, R for vesicle size, and diffusion coefficient Dint.

Yuki: It sounds like they're trying to move beyond just saying "exocytosis happens" to saying "exocytosis happens with a pore of this specific geometry and these transport properties." That shift from description to parameterization is huge for population studies.

Ines: They develop scaling laws for tau based on analytical models, and they calibrate those predictions against detailed numerical simulations to get a closed form expression for tau that fits the data. This is the core method they are introducing.

Marcus: The implication here is that if you can accurately determine this tau using their model, you gain a tool to estimate structural features of the vesicle and how fast things diffuse inside it, which are usually hidden variables in these measurements.

Yuki: So if we can get better estimates for the pore width or diffusion coefficient, that helps us understand how different types of vesicles behave biologically under stress or during different developmental stages.

Ines: Precisely. They show that this physics-based compact model works well, and they achieve a root mean square percent error of six point four four percent when comparing their analytical tau to simulation tau across various geometric parameters.

The paper's summary: Marcus: So, to summarize the paper "Extraction of geometric and transport parameters from the time constant of exocytosis transients measured by nanoscale electrodes," they are developing scaling laws for the decay time constant tau for VIEC single-exponential transients using analytical models and large scale simulations.

Ines: They take a model system where vesicles interact with a UME, opening a pore at time zero, and molecules diffuse through it to an electrochemical reaction sensor that generates a current proportional to the net flux of molecules. The decay signal post seventy-five percent peak is what they use to characterize the non-dense core vesicles.

Yuki: It’s essentially saying that this transient signal decay is a good representative of the whole exocytosis event, and tau is our key parameter for characterizing those events in non-dense core vesicles.

Marcus: They derive an analytical expression for tau, which they find assumes the pore width remains unchanged after it reaches its peak. This expression involves several parameters like K, R cubed, h to the power of zero point thirty-one d to the power of zero point seven w to the negative one point six eight Dint divided by one plus one over gamma.

Ines: They then validate this against detailed numerical simulations and experimental data, which show that tau varies as R cubed and w to the negative two, which is consistent with their analytical model’s power law anticipation.

Yuki: So they are not just fitting a curve; they are deriving a functional dependence based on the physical assumptions about pore dynamics, which is stronger than just fitting data points.

Marcus: The main implication they draw is that this analytical expression for tau allows for better estimates of geometric and transport parameters by removing some of the need for certain assumptions in existing current estimation techniques.

The paper's improvements: Ines: The improvements suggested by these results are pretty practical. They suggest that this analytical expression, given in equation seven can compare very well with experimental data and allows for better estimates of key parameters related to exocytosis when used correctly.

Marcus: It’s not just about the final formula; it’s about how they use it. The paper points out that by combining this model with the FESA methodology in cases involving VIEC with resistance pulse, you can get even better estimates for pore width and intra-vesicular diffusion coefficient.

Yuki: That combination sounds promising because it suggests a pathway to get more reliable parameters for single vesicles, which feeds back into understanding the wider biological context of how these vesicles are behaving.

Ines: They also emphasize that their model predictions compare very well with experimental data and allows for better estimates for back extraction of key parameters related to exocytosis, specifically when you look at pore opening dynamics.

Marcus: The authors mention that their model predictions allow them to resolve discrepancies seen in experimental data, like those observed in the SN = four case when comparing their analytical tau with simulation tau. They show that the variation in alpha and beta is very narrow, indicating a robust power law estimate for the decay constant.

Yuki: That robustness, where the parameters stay within a very narrow range, gives us confidence that these scaling laws are not just coincidental fits but reflect real underlying physical constraints on exocytosis.

Conclusion: Ines: So to wrap up this paper, they developed an analytical expression for tau that compares well with extensive numerical simulations and reported experimental data for VIEC. It gives us a way to predict tau based on geometric and transport parameters.

Marcus: The main implication is that this model provides a tool for better back extraction of key parameters related to exocytosis, like pore width and diffusion coefficient, especially when you use it with methods like FESA.

Yuki: For me, what this means is that we get more reliable physical parameters for single vesicles. That helps us connect the physical properties of these tiny structures to the actual biological processes happening inside them across different cell types or conditions.

Ines: Yeah, and overall, they show that physics-based compact models can allow for novel strategies for self consistent parameter extraction across multiple features in these nanoscale measurements. The work on "Extraction of geometric and transport parameters from the time constant of exocytosis transients measured by nanoscale electrodes" is a solid piece of work for understanding the mechanics behind vesicular release.

Marcus: It’s a compact model that works well, with an RMSPE of six point four four percent against simulations, which gives us confidence in using this framework to anticipate simulation results for new parameter combinations in VIEC studies.

Indian Institute of Technology Bombay

q-bio.SC, q-bio.QM

Submitted: 2024-10-09

Updated: 2024-10-09

Comments: 7 pages, 5 figures

DOI: 10.1007/s00249-025-01744-0

License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/

Importance score: 75/100

The gist: Extraction of geometric and transport parameters from the time constant of exocytosis transients measured by nanoscale electrodes develops scaling laws for the decay time constant (τ) for VIEC

Key concepts

VIEC
Vesicular Exocytosis with Electrochemical Measurement (VIEC) is the process where vesicles containing biomolecules fuse with a sensor surface, creating a measurable current. The decay of this current signal after the initial peak provides information about the physical properties of the exocytosis event.
Time Constant (τ)
The time constant represents how quickly the measured electrochemical signal decays after reaching 75% of its peak during a VIEC transient. This parameter is key to characterizing non-dense core vesicles and is used to derive geometric and transport properties like pore width.
Scaling Laws
Scaling laws describe how a physical quantity, like the decay time constant (τ), changes proportionally with various geometric and transport parameters (e.g., vesicle radius R or pore width w). The paper establishes these laws using an analytical model to relate $ au$ to these measurable physical dimensions.
FESA Methodology
Finite Element Simulation Algorithm (FESA) is a numerical simulation technique used in this study. It is combined with the analytical model (equation 7) to self-consistently estimate unknown parameters like pore width and intra-vesicular diffusion coefficient, improving the accuracy of physical measurements.

Terminology

Summary

Extraction of geometric and transport parameters from the time constant of exocytosis transients measured by nanoscale electrodes develops scaling laws for the decay time constant (τ) for VIEC single-exponential transients through analytical models and large scale simulations The model predictions are then calibrated against detailed numerical simulations to develop a closed form expression for τ

Model System Description

In VIEC, vesicles filled with bio-molecules come in contact with an UME resulting in the opening of a pore As the pore opens at time t = 0, the biomolecules diffuse through the pore and reach the sensor Electrochemical reaction at the UME results in a current (see Fig. 1b) which is proportional to the net flux of bio-molecules at the sensor surface The transient decay signal of VIEC will be a good representative of such exocytosis events The key parameter that characterises the measured signal in non-dense core vesicles is the time constant (τ) of the exponential decay of the signal post 75% of peak

Analytical Derivation

The time constants for the exponential decay of VIEC transients can be estimated once we identify an appropriate rate equation for the flux at the sensor surface The time constant for the VIEC transients measured at the sensor is given as: τ = K R cubed h 0.31 d 0.07 w-1.68 Dint (1 + 1/γ) This expression is derived by assuming the pore width remains unchanged after it reaches its peak

Simulation Validation

The simulation results indicate that τ varies as ≈ R cubed and ≈ w-2, which is close to the power law anticipated by our analytical model The variation in the value of α and β is in a very narrow range indicating that the power law is a good estimate for the decay constant The root mean square percent error (RMSPE) of the analytical τ with simulation τ is 6.44%

Application and Conclusion

The key insight that emerges from our analytical predictions and subsequently verified by numerical simulations is the analytical expression for τ given in equation 7 Our model predictions compare very well with experimental data and allows better estimates for back extraction of key parameters related to exocytosis The model enables better estimation of pore width and intra-vesicular diffusion coefficient by combining with the FESA methodology in the case of VIEC with resistance pulse In summary, our proposed analytical expression in equation 7 for τ compares well with extensive numerical simulations for VIEC and reported experimental data

References

[1] J. D. Keighron, Y. Wang, and A.-S. Cans, Electrochemistry of single-vesicle events, Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry 13, 159 (2020)

[2] C. Amatore, S. Arbault, M. Guille, and F. Lemaˆıtre, Electrochemical monitoring of single cell secretion: Vesicular exocytosis and oxidative stress, Chemical Reviews 108, 2585 (2008)

[3] E. Karatekin, Toward a unified picture of the exocytotic fusion pore, FEBS Letters 592, 3563 (2018)

[4] E. S. Bucher and R. M. Wightman, Electrochemical analysis of neurotransmitters, Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry 8, 239 (2015)

[5] X. Liu, Y. Tong, and P.-P. Fang, Recent development in amperometric measurements of vesicular exocytosis, TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 113, 13 (2019)

[6] M. Guille-Collignon and F. Lemaˆıtre, Recent developments concerning the investigation of exocytosis with amperometry, Current Opinion in Electrochemistry 29, 100751 (2021)

[7] N. T. N. Phan, X. Li, and A. G. Ewing, Measuring synaptic vesicles using cellular electrochemistry and nanoscale molecular imaging, Nature Reviews Chemistry 1, 0048 (2017)

[8] C. Amatore, A. I. Oleinick, and I. Svir, Reconstruction of aperture functions during full fusion in vesicular ex-

[9] C. Amatore, A. I. Oleinick, and I. Svir, Diffusion from within a spherical body with partially blocked surface: Diffusion through a constant surface area, ChemPhysChem 11, 149 (2010)

[10] A. A. Alabi and R. W. Tsien, Perspectives on kiss-andrun: Role in exocytosis, endocytosis, and neurotransmission, Annual Review of Physiology 75, 393 (2013)

[11] L. J. Mellander, R. Trouillon, M. I. Svensson, and A. G. Ewing, Amperometric post spike feet reveal most exocytosis is via extended kiss-and-run fusion, Scientific Reports 2, 907 (2012)

[12] A. Hatamie, L. Ren, H. Dou, N. R. Gandasi, P. Rorsman, and A. Ewing, Nanoscale amperometry reveals that only a fraction of vesicular serotonin content is released during exocytosis from beta cells, Angewandte Chemie International Edition 60, 7593 (2021)

[13] A. Oleinick, I. Svir, and C. Amatore, ‘full fusion’ is not ineluctable during vesicular exocytosis of neurotransmitters by endocrine cells, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 473, 20160684 (2017)

[14] R. Trouillon and A. G. Ewing, Actin controls the vesicular fraction of dopamine released during extended kiss and run exocytosis, ACS Chemical Biology 9, 812 (2014)

[15] Y. Liu, J. Du, M. Wang, J. Zhang, C. Liu, and X. Li, Recent progress in quantitatively monitoring vesicular neurotransmitter release and storage with micro/nanoelectrodes, Frontiers in Chemistry 8 (2021)

[16] K. A. White and B. N. Kim, Quantifying neurotransmitter secretion at single-vesicle resolution using highdensity complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor electrode array, Nature Communications 12, 431 (2021)

[17] X. Zhang and A. G. Ewing, Pore-opening dynamics of single nanometer biovesicles at an electrified interface, ACS Nano 16, 9852 (2022)

[18] W. Shin, G. Arpino, S. Thiyagarajan, R. S. Ge, Z. McDargh, X. Guo, L. Wei, O. Shupliakov, A Jin, B O’Shaughnessy, and L.-G Wu Vesicle shrinking and enlargement play opposing roles in the release of exocytotic contents Cell Reports 30, 421 (2020)

[19] X. Liu, A. Savy, S. Maurin, L. Grimaud, F. Darchen, D Quinton, E Labb´e O Buriez J Delacotte F Lemaˆıtre and M Guille-Collignon A dual functional electroactive and fluorescent probe for coupled measurements of vesicular exocytosis with high spatial and temporal resolution Angewandte Chemie International Edition 56, 2366 (2017)

[20] A. Oleinick, F. Lemaˆıtre, M. G. Collignon, I Svir, and C Amatore Vesicular release of neurotransmitters: converting amperometric measurements into size dynamics and energetics of initial fusion pores Faraday Discuss 164, 33 (2013)

[21] C Gu, X Zhang, and A G Ewing Comparison of disk and nanotip electrodes for measurement of single-cell amperometry during exocytotic release Analytical Chemistry 92, 10268 (2020)

[22] X Li, L Ren, J Dunevall, D Ye, H S White, M A Edwards and A G Ewing Nanopore opening at flat and nanotip conical electrodes during vesicle impact electrochemical cytometry ACS Nano 12, 3010 (2018)

[23] Y Bouret, M Guille-Collignon, and F Lemaˆıtre Simulations of amperometric monitoring of exocytosis: moderate ph variations within the cell-electrode cleft with the buffer diffusion Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 413, 6769 (2021)

[24] M B Jackson, Y.-T Hsiao, and C.-W Chang Fusion pore expansion and contraction during catecholamine release from endocrine cells Biophysical Journal 119, 219 (2020)

[25] J Dunevall, H Fathali, N Najafinobar, J Lovric, J Wigstr¨om A.-S Cans and A G Ewing Characterizing the catecholamine content of single mammalian vesicles by collision–adsorption events at an electrode Journal of the American Chemical Society 137, 4344 (2015)

[26] H Smida, C Thobie-Gautier, M Boujtita, and E Lebegue Recent advances in single liposome electrochemistry Current Opinion in Electrochemistry 36, 101141 (2022)

[27] R Borges, C Gu, J-D Machado, and A G Ewing The dynamic nature of exocytosis from large secretory vesicles a view from electrochemistry and imaging Cell Calcium 110, 102699 (2023)

[28] L-G Wu, E Hamid, W Shin, and H-C Chiang Exocytosis and endocytosis: Modes functions and coupling mechanisms Annual Review of Physiology 76, 301 (2014)

[29] Q Yue, K Wang, M Guan, Z Zhao, X Li, P Yu and L Mao Single-vesicle electrochemistry reveals sex difference in vesicular storage and release of catecholamine Angewandte Chemie International Edition 61 e202117596 (2022)

[30] K Hu, R Jia, A Hatamie, K L Le Vo, M V Mirkin and A G Ewing Correlating molecule count and release kinetics with vesicular size using open carbon nanopipettes Journal of the American Chemical Society 142, 16910 (2020)

[31] X-W Zhang, A Hatamie, and A G Ewing Simultaneous quantification of vesicle size and catecholamine content by resistive pulses in nanopores and vesicle impact electrochemical cytometry Journal of the American Chemical Society 142, 4093 (2020)

[32] P R Nair and M A Alam Performance limits of nanobiosensors Applied Physics Letters 88, 233120 (2006)

[33] P R Nair and M A Alam Screening-limited response of nanobiosensors Nano Letters 8, 1281 (2008)

[34] P R Nair and M A Alam Kinetic response of surfaces defined by finite fractals Fractals 18, 461 (2010)

[35] P R Nair and M A Alam A compact analytical formalism for current transients in electrochemical systems Analyst 138, 525 (2013)

[36] B Ray, P R Nair, and M A Alam Annealing dependent performance of organic bulk-heterojunction solar cells: A theoretical perspective Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 95, 3287 (2011)

[37] R Trouillon, Y Lin, L J Mellander, J D Keighron and A G Ewing Evaluating the diffusion coefficient of dopamine at the cell surface during amperometric detection disk vs ring microelectrodes Anal Chem 85, 6421 (2013)

[38] G Clermont and S Zenker The inverse problem in mathematical biology Mathematical Biosciences 260, 11 (2015)

Table II

τ (ms) Exp eqn 7

[SN Fig Ref w nm R nm Exp]

[2] [SI Fig S2 138 316 3.5 2.3]

[SN Fig S2 113 287 3.4 2.4]

[SN Fig S2 31 208 7.0 7.2]

[SN Fig S2 45 189 6.3 2.8]

[5 Fig Ref w nm R nm Exp]

Table I

Mean ± SD for α, β, δ, and κ γ α β δ κ

[5 3.31 ± 0.09-1.77 ± 0.08 0.25 ± 0.07 0.27 ± 0.09]

[1] [36]

[5 Fig 5 Comparison of simulation results (solid lines) with τ from equation 7 (dashed lines) as function of various geometric parameters For both set of results, we have used γ = 10, h = 5 nm and d = 20 nm. The blue curves correspond to R = 80 nm while the black data sets correspond to w = 45 nm

[Pore Width (nm) log (Dint)]

Comparison of Experimental and Analytical τ τ (ms)

[SN Fig Ref w nm R nm Exp]

[5 Fig Ref w nm R nm Exp]

Mean ± SD for α, β, δ, and κ γ α β δ κ

[Avg 3.25 ± 0.09-1.73 ± 0.10 0.27 ± 0.09]

[5 Fig Ref w nm R nm Exp]

Mean ± SD for α, β, δ, and κ γ α β δ κ

[Avg 3.25 ± 0.09-1.73 ± 0.10 0.27 ± 0.

Improvements for AI systems

  1. Develop an analytical model for scaling laws of the decay time constant tau based on geometric and transport parameters by using equation 7 to predict tau in terms of R, w, h, d, Dint, and gamma. This allows AI systems to accurately estimate pore width (w) and intra-vesicular diffusion coefficient (Dint) by combining the model with Finite Element Simulation Algorithm (FESA).

  2. Implement a self-consistent estimation methodology where FESA is used with equation 7 to improve the estimate of w and Dint for specific vesicles, resolving discrepancies seen in experimental data like SN = 4. This capability allows AI systems to provide more reliable parameters for single-vesicle characterization.

  3. Enhance parameter estimation by using the derived fractional exponents (3.30, -1.68, 0.31, and 0.07) to update equation 6 into the final expression for tau: tau = K R cubed.30 h 0.31 d 0.07 w-1.68 Dint / (1 + 1/gamma). This provides a closed-form, highly accurate prediction of the decay constant across various geometric and transport conditions relevant to VIEC applications.

  4. Create a predictive tool that compares analytical predictions with numerical simulations using the derived proportionality constant K = 1.39, achieving an RMSPE of 6.44%. This system can reliably anticipate simulation results for new parameter combinations, improving the efficiency of parameter space exploration in VIEC studies.

Related papers