The day in conversation for 2026-10-21
discussion
Transcript
The discussion: Rosa: The core strength of PHAST-Net seems to be how it forces different representations—the wavelet transform and those high-res spectrograms—to share a common latent space before applying the physics loss, but I’m still curious if that attention mechanism is actually suppressing cross-terms effectively across those vastly different dimensional scales. Dev: From my perspective on the network architecture, that unified space is crucial because it allows us to treat time and frequency as coupled variables rather than separate domains; but what specific metrics are you using to quantify that suppression when comparing the output spectrograms against a standard learned representation? Taro: That quantification is tricky because OncoReg deals with spatial registration where the error tolerance is much tighter, focusing on voxel-level alignment between cone-beam and
More episodes
- 2607.12075-Calibrated Selective Prediction Using Deep Ensembles for ROI-Based Thyroid Nodule Ultrasound Classification Under Dataset Shift: A Retrospective Evaluation
- 2511.07560-EvoPS: Evolutionary Patch Selection for Whole Slide Image Analysis in Computational Pathology
- The day in conversation for 2026-11-01
- Daily Summary for 2026-11-01
- 2601.19743-Interpretable and backpropagation-free Green Learning for efficient multi-task echocardiographic segmentation and classification
- 2609.09801-Morphological Decoupling-Based Skeletal Classification for Clinical Assessment of Malocclusion
- 2606.04680-Read What You Hear: Reference-Free Hypotheses Evaluation with Acoustic Discrepancy
- 2606.25310-Diffusion Models for Radio Map Estimation: Theoretical Performance Analysis and Sampling Rate Guideline
- 2306.14634-Generalized Graph Signal Sampling by Difference-of-Convex Optimization
- 2509.14836-Sampling Method for Generalized Graph Signals With Pre-Selected Vertices via DC Optimization